Home | Visitor | Spread |
Charlotte | Radford | 3.7 |
Oklahoma St. | North Texas | 5.3 |
Oregon | Wisconsin | 5.0 |
Southern Utah | Eastern Kentucky | 4.1 |
March 21, 2023
PiRate Ratings College Basketball — Tuesday, March 21, 2023
March 20, 2023
PiRate Ratings College Basketball — Monday, March 20, 2023
Home | Visitor | Spread |
Indiana St. | Eastern Kentucky | 5.7 |
Southern Utah | Rice | 6.3 |
San Jose St. | Radford | 4.3 |
Charlotte | Milwaukee | 6.4 |
March 6, 2020
PiRate Ratings College Basketball For March 6, 2020
Friday’s Games
Home |
Visitor |
Spread |
Akron |
Kent St. |
6.7 |
Belmont |
Eastern Kentucky |
9.7 |
Bowling Green |
Buffalo |
1.6 |
Bradley |
Southern Illinois |
4.1 |
Canisius |
Niagara |
5.8 |
Central Michigan |
Western Michigan |
4.6 |
Clemson |
Georgia Tech |
3.1 |
Dartmouth |
Yale |
-6.5 |
Davidson |
VCU |
2.0 |
Duquesne |
Richmond |
-0.7 |
Harvard |
Brown |
12.0 |
Indiana St. |
Missouri St |
0.9 |
Loyola (Chi.) |
Valparaiso |
3.7 |
Manhattan |
Fairfield |
4.9 |
Miami (O) |
Ohio |
-0.1 |
Monmouth |
Siena |
1.3 |
Murray St. |
Austin Peay |
2.1 |
North Carolina St. |
Wake Forest |
7.0 |
Northern Illinois |
Ball St. |
0.4 |
Northern Iowa |
Drake |
9.8 |
Pennsylvania |
Cornell |
11.4 |
Pepperdine |
Santa Clara |
0.6 |
Princeton |
Columbia |
10.7 |
Radford |
Hampton |
12.3 |
Saint Peter’s |
Iona |
4.5 |
Samford |
VMI |
-3.1 |
San Diego St. |
Boise St. |
8.9 |
San Francisco |
Loyola Marymount |
7.2 |
Toledo |
Eastern Michigan |
5.7 |
Utah St. |
Wyoming |
16.2 |
Winthrop |
Gardner-Webb |
4.5 |
Wofford |
Citadel |
12.6 |
Key TV Games on Friday
Time (EST) |
Network |
Home |
Visitor |
1:00 PM |
ESPN+ |
Northern Iowa |
Drake |
6:00 PM |
ESPN+ |
Winthrop |
Gardner-Webb |
6:00 PM |
ESPNU |
Bowling Green |
Buffalo |
6:30 PM |
CBSSN |
Akron |
Kent St. |
7:00 PM |
ESPN+ |
Duquesne |
Richmond |
7:00 PM |
ESPN+ |
Monmouth |
Siena |
7:00 PM |
ESPN+ |
Harvard |
Brown |
7:00 PM |
ESPN+ |
Penn |
Cornell |
7:00 PM |
ESPN+ |
Princeton |
Columbia |
7:00 PM |
ESPN+ |
Dartmouth |
Yale |
7:00 PM |
ESPN+ |
Loyola (Chi.) |
Valparaiso |
8:00 PM |
ESPNU |
Belmont |
Eastern Kentucky |
8:00 PM |
ESPN+ |
Radford |
Hampton |
9:00 PM |
CBSSN |
San Diego St. |
Boise St. |
10:00 PM |
ESPNU |
Murray St. |
Austin Peay |
11:30 PM |
CBSSN |
Utah St. |
Wyoming |
Conference Tournament Updates
Atlantic Sun Tournament |
|||
Semifinals |
|||
Winner |
Score |
Loser |
Score |
Liberty |
66 |
Stetson |
62 |
Lipscomb |
73 |
North Florida |
71 |
Liberty will now host Lipscomb for the Atlantic Sun Championship on Sunday at 3:00 PM EDT. The game will be televised on ESPN.
Big South Tournament |
|||
Quarterfinals |
|||
Winner |
Score |
Loser |
Score |
Winthrop |
106 |
USC Upstate |
70 |
Gardner-Webb |
72 |
UNC Asheville |
62 |
Radford |
62 |
Charleston Southern |
48 |
Hampton |
78 |
Longwood |
53 |
Semifinals |
March 6 |
at #1 Seed Radford |
|
Team |
Team |
Time (ET) |
TV |
2 Winthrop (22-10) |
3 Gardner-Webb (16-15) |
6:00 PM |
ESPN+ |
1 Radford (21-10) |
5 Hampton (14-18) |
8:30 PM |
ESPN+ |
Horizon League Tournament |
|||
Quarterfinals |
|||
Winner |
Score |
Loser |
Score |
Green Bay |
78 |
Oakland |
63 |
Illinois Chicago |
67 |
Youngstown |
61 |
The tournament now moves to Indianapolis for the final two rounds. The top four seeds have advanced. On Monday night, #1 Wright St. will play #4 Illinois-Chicago at 7:00 PM EDT on ESPNU. Then 30 minutes after the conclusion of that game, #2 Northern Kentucky will play #3 Green Bay on ESPN2.
Missouri Valley Tournament (Arch Madness) |
|||
1st Round |
|||
Winner |
Score |
Loser |
Score |
Drake |
75 |
Illinois St. |
65 |
Valparaiso |
58 |
Evansville |
55 |
Quarterfinals |
March 6 |
St. Louis (Enterprise Center) |
|
Team |
Team |
Time (ET) |
TV |
1 Northern Iowa (25-5) |
8 Drake (19-13) |
1:00 PM |
MVC TV Network |
4 Bradley (20-11) |
5 Southern Illinois (16-15) |
3:30 PM |
MVC TV Network |
2 Loyola (Chi.) (21-10) |
7 Valparaiso (17-15) |
7:00 PM |
MVC TV Network |
3 Indiana St. (18-11) |
6 Missouri St. (15-16) |
9:30 PM |
MVC TV Network |
Mountain West Tournament |
|||
Quarterfinals |
|||
Winner |
Score |
Loser |
Score |
San Diego St. |
73 |
Air Force |
60 |
Boise St. |
67 |
UNLV |
61 |
Utah St. |
75 |
New Mexico |
70 |
Wyoming |
74 |
Nevada |
71 |
Semifinals |
March 6 |
Las Vegas (Thomas & Mack Center) |
|
Team |
Team |
Time (ET) |
TV |
1 San Diego St. (29-1) |
5 Boise St. (20-11) |
9:00 PM |
CBSSN |
2 Utah St. (24-8) |
11 Wyoming (9-23) |
11:30 PM |
CBSSN |
Ohio Valley Tournament |
|||
Quarterfinals |
|||
Winner |
Score |
Loser |
Score |
Eastern Kentucky |
58 |
Tennessee St. |
48 |
Austin Peay |
76 |
Eastern Illinois |
65 |
Semifinals |
March 6 |
Evansville, IN (Ford Center) |
|
Team |
Team |
Time (ET) |
TV |
1 Belmont (24-7) |
4 Eastern Kentucky (16-16) |
8:00 PM |
ESPNU |
2 Murray St. (22-8) |
3 Austin Peay (21-11) |
10:00 PM |
ESPNU |
Patriot League Tournament |
|||
Quarterfinals |
|||
Winner |
Score |
Loser |
Score |
Bucknell |
64 |
American |
59 |
Boston U |
69 |
Navy |
63 |
Lafayette |
73 |
Army |
68 |
Colgate |
83 |
Lehigh |
70 |
The tournament resumes Sunday with the semifinal round. Boston U hosts Bucknell at 12:00 PM and Colgate hosts Lafayette at 2:00 PM. Both games will be televised on CBSSN.
Southern Tournament |
|||
1st Round |
March 6 |
Asheville, NC (Harrah’s Cherokee Center) |
|
Team |
Team |
Time ET |
TV |
8 Samford (10-22) |
9 VMI (8-23) |
5:00 PM |
ESPN+ |
7 Wofford (16-15) |
10 The Citadel (6-23) |
7:30 PM |
ESPN+ |
Southern Tournament |
|||
Quarterfinals |
March 7 |
Asheville, NC (Harrah’s Cherokee Center) |
|
Team |
Team |
Time ET |
TV |
1 East Tennessee St. (27-4) |
Samford/VMI |
12:00 PM |
ESPN+ |
4 Mercer (17-14) |
5 Western Carolina (18-11) |
2:30 PM |
ESPN+ |
2 Furman (25-6) |
Wofford/The Citadel |
6:00 PM |
ESPN+ |
3 UNC Greensboro (23-8) |
6 Chattanooga (19-12) |
8:30 PM |
ESPN+ |
Southern Tournament |
|||
Semifinals |
March 8 |
Asheville, NC (Harrah’s Cherokee Center) |
|
Team |
Team |
Time ET |
TV |
ETSU/Samford/VMI |
Mercer/Western Carolina |
4:00 PM |
ESPN+ |
Furman/Wofford/Citadel |
UNCG/Chattanooga |
6:30 PM |
ESPN+ |
Southern Tournament |
|||
Championship |
March 9 |
Asheville, NC (Harrah’s Cherokee Center) |
|
Team |
Team |
Time ET |
TV |
7:00 PM |
ESPN |
This tournament has six teams talented enough to win and receive the automatic bid. East Tennessee has a long winning streak, and the Buccaneers have a chance to earn an at-large bid if they fail to win the tournament. Furman and UNC-Greensboro appeared to be a little off their peaks as the calendar flipped to March, while Chattanooga and Western Carolina are playing their best ball of the season.
West Coast Tournament |
|||
1st Round |
|||
Winner |
Score |
Loser |
Score |
Loyola Marymount |
75 |
San Diego |
61 |
Santa Clara |
76 |
Portland |
62 |
2nd Round |
March 6 |
Las Vegas (Orleans Arena) |
|
Team |
Team |
Time (ET) |
TV |
5 San Francisco (20-11) |
8 Loyola Marymount (11-20) |
9:00 PM |
BYUtv |
6 Pepperdine (15-15) |
7 Santa Clara (20-12) |
11:30 PM |
BYUtv |
Coming Later Today: Updated Bracketology
March 10, 2019
PiRate Ratings College Basketball For Sunday, March 10, 2019
Today’s PiRate Ratings Spreads
Home |
Rating |
HCA |
Visitor |
Rating |
Spread |
Lipscomb |
109.0 |
3.0 |
Liberty |
105.9 |
6.1 |
Radford |
102.7 |
2.5 |
Gardner-Webb |
99.3 |
5.9 |
Hofstra |
106.5 |
0.0 |
James Madison |
93.8 |
12.7 |
William & Mary |
97.6 |
0.0 |
Delaware |
94.7 |
2.9 |
Northeastern |
105.6 |
0.0 |
UNC Wilmington |
94.7 |
10.9 |
Charleston |
103.4 |
1.0 |
Drexel |
95.2 |
9.2 |
Siena |
95.4 |
2.5 |
Iona |
97.7 |
0.2 |
Canisius |
95.1 |
0.0 |
Monmouth |
93.3 |
1.8 |
Northern Iowa |
99.1 |
0.0 |
Bradley |
99.5 |
-0.4 |
Colgate |
102.1 |
2.5 |
Navy |
92.8 |
11.8 |
Bucknell |
101.4 |
2.5 |
Lehigh |
100.3 |
3.6 |
Wofford |
112.9 |
0.0 |
East Tennessee St. |
106.6 |
6.3 |
UNC Greensboro |
105.5 |
0.0 |
Furman |
107.9 |
-2.4 |
North Dakota St. |
97.5 |
0.0 |
Oral Roberts |
92.8 |
4.7 |
South Dakota |
97.4 |
1.0 |
Purdue Fort Wayne |
98.7 |
-0.3 |
Cincinnati |
111.8 |
3.0 |
Houston |
114.5 |
0.3 |
Penn St. |
109.9 |
2.5 |
Illinois |
106.5 |
5.9 |
Indiana |
110.4 |
3.0 |
Rutgers |
106.3 |
7.1 |
East Carolina |
93.7 |
2.5 |
Connecticut |
105.2 |
-9.0 |
Nebraska |
110.5 |
3.0 |
Iowa |
110.8 |
2.7 |
South Florida |
103.5 |
3.0 |
SMU |
103.8 |
2.7 |
Ohio St. |
110.3 |
3.0 |
Wisconsin |
115.5 |
-2.2 |
Conference Tournaments Update
America East Conference |
|||
All games at home floor of higher seeds |
|||
Quarterfinals–Saturday, March 9 |
|||
Md.-Baltimore Co. |
62 |
Albany |
54 |
Vermont |
73 |
Maine |
57 |
Binghamton |
73 |
Stony Brook |
71 |
Hartford |
78 |
UMass Lowell |
70 |
Semifinals–Tuesday, March 12 |
|||
Seed |
Home |
Seed |
Visitor |
1 |
Vermont (25-6) |
7 |
Binghamton (10-22) |
3 |
Maryland-Baltimore Co. (20-12) |
4 |
Hartford (18-14) |
Atlantic Sun Conference
*** Championship Game–Sunday, March 10 *** |
|||
Seed |
Home |
Seed |
Visitor |
1 |
Lipscomb (25-6) |
2 |
Liberty (27-6) |
Big South Conference
*** Championship Game–Sunday, March 10 (at Radford) *** |
|||
Seed |
Home Team |
Seed |
Visitors |
2 |
Radford (22-10) |
4 |
Gardner-Webb (22-11) |
Colonial Athletic Association |
|||
Site: North Charleston Coliseum, North Charleston, SC |
|||
First Round–Saturday, March 9 |
|||
James Madison |
74 |
Towson |
73 |
UNC Wilmington |
93 |
Elon |
86 |
Quarterfinals–Sunday, March 10 |
|||
Seed |
Team |
Seed |
Team |
1 |
Hofstra (25-6) |
8 |
James Madison (14-18) |
4 |
William & Mary (14-16) |
5 |
Delaware (16-15) |
2 |
Northeastern (20-10) |
10 |
UNC Wilmington (10-22) |
3 |
Charleston (23-8) |
6 |
Drexel (13-18) |
Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference |
|||
Site: Times Union Center, Albany, NY (Siena) |
Quarterfinals–Saturday, March 9 |
|||
Monmouth |
98 |
Quinnipiac |
92 |
Siena |
87 |
Rider |
81 |
Semifinals–Sunday, March 10 |
|||
Seed |
Team |
Seed |
Team |
1 |
Iona (15-15) |
5 |
Siena (17-15) |
2 |
Canisius (15-16) |
6 |
Monmouth (13-20) |
Missouri Valley Conference (Arch Madness) |
|||
Site: Enterprise Center, St. Louis, MO |
|||
Semifinals–Saturday, March 9 |
|||
Bradley |
53 |
Loyola (Chi) |
51 |
Northern Iowa |
60 |
Drake |
58 |
*** Championship Game–Sunday, March 10 *** |
|||
Seed |
Team |
Seed |
Team |
6 |
Northern Iowa (16-17) |
5 |
Bradley (19-14) |
Northeast Conference |
|||
All games at home floor of higher seeds |
|||
Semifinals–Saturday, March 9 |
|||
St. Francis (PA) |
72 |
Long Island |
64 |
Fairleigh-Dickinson |
66 |
Robert Morris |
62 |
Championship Game–Tuesday, March 12 |
|||
Seed |
Home |
Seed |
Visitor |
1 |
St. Francis (PA) (18-13) |
2 |
Fairleigh-Dickinson (19-13) |
Ohio Valley Conference |
|||
*** Championship Game–Saturday, March 9 *** |
|||
Murray St. |
77 |
Belmont |
65 |
Champion: Murray St. 27-4
Patriot League |
|||
All games at home floor of higher seeds |
Semifinals–Sunday, March 10 |
|||
Seed |
Home |
Seed |
Visitor |
1 |
Colgate (22-10) |
5 |
Navy (12-18) |
2 |
Bucknell (20-10) |
3 |
Lehigh (20-10) |
Southern Conference |
|||
Site: US Cellular Center, Asheville, NC |
|||
Quarterfinals–Saturday, March 9 |
|||
Wofford |
99 |
VMI |
72 |
East Tennessee St. |
68 |
Chattanooga |
64 |
UNC Greensboro |
77 |
Samford |
70 |
Furman |
85 |
Mercer |
74 |
Semifinals–Sunday, March 10 |
|||
Seed |
Team |
Seed |
Team |
1 |
Wofford (27-4) |
4/5 |
East Tennessee St. (24-8) |
2 |
UNC Greensboro (27-5) |
3 |
Furman (25-6) |
Summit League |
|||
Site: Denny Sanford Premier Center, Sioux Falls, SD |
|||
Quarterfinals–Saturday, March 9 |
|||
Western Illinois |
79 |
South Dakota St. |
76 |
Omaha |
81 |
North Dakota |
76 |
Quarterfinals–Sunday, March 10 |
|||
Seed |
Team |
Seed |
Team |
4 |
Purdue Fort Wayne (17-14) |
5 |
South Dakota (13-16) |
3 |
North Dakota St. (15-15) |
6 |
Oral Roberts (11-20) |
West Coast Conference |
|||
Site: Orleans Arena, Las Vegas, NV |
|||
Quarterfinals–Saturday, March 9 |
|||
San Diego |
80 |
BYU |
57 |
Pepperdine |
89 |
San Francisco |
72 |
Semifinals–Monday, March 11 |
|||
Seed |
Team |
Seed |
Team |
2 |
Saint Mary’s (20-11) |
6 |
San Diego (21-13) |
1 |
Gonzaga (29-2) |
8 |
Pepperdine (16-17) |
Teams In The Big Dance
Murray St. (OVC) 27-4
March 21, 2009
A PiRate Look At The NCAA Tournament: 2nd Round Games Played On Sunday, March 22, 2009
A PiRate Look At The NCAA Tournament
2nd Round Games Played On
Sunday, March 22, 2009
Friday’s games were a little more surprising than Thursday’s games, and several of the games that were won by the team expected to win were exciting and tough to the finish. Siena has now won first round games in consecutive years over teams from a power conference. The Saints could be on the verge of becoming Gonzaga East.
Our picks for day two went 11-5, bringing our total for round one to 24-8. FWIW, we not only picked Siena to beat Ohio State, we almost hit the score exactly, missing by just two points. Of course, a broken watch displays the correct time twice a day.
Here is a look at the Round of 32 games for Sunday.
(numbers in parentheses are PiRate Criteria scores)
East Region
Pittsburgh (14) vs. Oklahoma State (0) [Schedule strengths are equal]: The Panthers struggled against East Tennessee’s pressure defense, committing numerous turnovers. They could have easily become the first number one seed to lose to a 16-seed. Oklahoma State is a quicker, better version of ETSU, but Pittsburgh should be able to hold off the pesky Cowboys. We expect Pitt to be ready for OSU’s pressure and play less error-prone ball. Pittsburgh will advance to the Sweet 16.
Prediction: Pittsburgh 73 Oklahoma State 62
Wisconsin (2) vs. Xavier (8) [Wisconsin has a schedule 2 points per game stronger]: The Badgers held on tough to eke out an overtime win over Florida State Friday night, while Xavier had an easier workout against Portland State. The Musketeers could sneak into the Sweet 16. They are the type of team that can beat Pittsburgh and even Duke if their three big shooters are on their mark. We believe Wisconsin’s best days are two years down the road, and it is a credit to Coach Bo Ryan to get them to the second round this year. However, we expect the Badgers to be out of the Dance after this one.
Prediction: Xavier 64 Wisconsin 57
South Region
Arizona State (4) vs. Syracuse (4) [Syracuse has a schedule 3 points per game stronger]: This should be the best game of the day. Arizona State has two excellent three-point shooters, and it takes a good outside shooting team to beat Syracuse. The Orangemen will press the tempo and force the Sun Devils to play at a faster pace than they would like. If Syracuse can keep from hitting the wall, they should advance.
Prediction: Syracuse 80 Arizona State 71
Midwest Region
Louisville (10) vs. Siena (5) [Louisville has a schedule 4 points per game stronger]: Siena had enough talent to top Ohio State, but Louisville will be too much for the Saints to handle. The Saints will not be able to beat the Cardinals playing the same game against a team with better athletes.
Prediction: Louisville 79 Siena 62
Arizona (-2) vs. Cleveland State (7) [Arizona has a schedule 4 points per game stronger]: This should be a close game. Arizona’s PiRate criteria score is a negative number, but when you add the four points for strength of schedule advantage, this game becomes a virtual tossup. CSU plays terrific defense, while Arizona relies more on offense. This game will be decided on the Cardinal side of the court. If Jordan Hill can hit his inside shots, Arizona should prevail. If Hill cannot get open or cannot connect from his normal range, then the Vikings can be this year’s surprise team in the Sweet 16.
Prediction: Arizona 65 Cleveland State 61
Dayton (5) vs. Kansas (10) [Kansas has a schedule 5 points per game stronger]: Kansas never expected North Dakota State to keep their round one game close for 35 minutes. Dayton never really pulled away from West Virginia, but the Flyers led throughout their game. Round two should be a different bird. Kansas looked a little rusty after losing early in the Big 12 Tournament and going a week without playing. They should play much better in round two, and Dayton won’t have enough talent to stop KU.
Prediction: Kansas 74 Dayton 64
Southern California (2) vs. Michigan State (7) [Michigan State has a schedule 1 point per game stronger]: On paper, Michigan State looks to be better than USC by double digit points. However, USC has put it all together in the past two weeks and must be considered 7-10 points better today than they were in January. We’ll stick with the Spartans to sneak by in this game, but a Trojan win would be no big surprise.
Prediction: Michigan State 71 Southern Cal 64
West Region
Missouri (14) vs. Marquette (9) [Schedule strengths are equal]: Missouri will wear Marquette down as the game wears on. Eventually, the Tigers will go on a run in the second half and put this game out of reach. A Memphis-Missouri Sweet 16 match would be possibly the most exciting game of the entire tournament.
Prediction: Missouri 74 Marquette 65
March 20, 2009
A PiRate Look At The NCAA Tournament: 2nd Round Games Played On Saturday, March 21, 2009
A PiRate Look At The NCAA Tournament
2nd Round Games Played On
Saturday, March 21, 2009
Thursdays games basically went according to expectations with a few exceptions. One number 12 seed won over a five-seed when Western Kentucky controlled Illinois for much of the night. We told you we thought WKU could pull off the upset, even though the system chose Illinois (but could not adjust for the loss of a key starter). For what it’s worth, our Thursday picks went 13-3.
Here is a look at the Round of 32 games for Saturday.
(numbers in parentheses are PiRate Criteria scores)
East Region
UCLA (14) vs. Villanova (9) [Villanova has a schedule 2 points per game stronger]: Both teams had scares in round one and were fortunate to survive to round two. The Bruins have the criteria advantage here, but Villanova has home town advantage plus a slight strength of schedule advantage. This game will look similar to the 1971 championship game between these same schools. UCLA won that won by single digits. That Villanova team had two stars, whereas the UCLA squad had five really good players. Usually five really good players can beat two stars, but home town advantage eliminates that advantage. We’ll go with the Bruins in a very close game.
Prediction: UCLA 64 Villanova 62
Texas (3) vs. Duke (14) [Duke has a schedule 4 points per game stronger]: Duke has all the advantages here. Watch Duke’s Gerald Henderson and Texas’s Damion James. This is the key to this game. If James can dominate better than Henderson, Texas has a chance. We’ll select the Blue Devils to win, but it should be an interesting game.
Prediction: Duke 75 Texas 69
South Region
North Carolina (17) vs. LSU (14) [North Carolina has a schedule 4 points per game stronger]: You usually never see two power conference championship teams facing off in the second round of the tournament, but the SEC is down this year. So the regular season SEC champion faces the regular season ACC champion. Add to that the fact that both of these teams have PiRate criteria in the double digit range. This is almost a home game for the Tar Heels, and they are the dominant team in this region. Carolina advances to the Sweet 16, and the SEC is done for the season.
Prediction: North Carolina 84 LSU 70
Western Kentucky (2) vs. Gonzaga (19) [Gonzaga has a schedule 2 points per game stronger]: Gonzaga turned it on in the final minutes of the night on Thursday and put Akron away with a quick spurt. Western took control quickly in their game against Illinois and then held off the Illini at the end. While the Hilltoppers advanced to the Sweet 16 last year, while Gonzaga went home early, we feel the Bulldogs are poised to make the trip to the next round this year.
Predicition: Gonzaga 77 Western Kentucky 70
Michigan (-4) vs. Oklahoma (9) [Michigan has a schedule 1 point per game stronger]: We can sum this game up in three words: Blake Griffin’s Health. If Griffin is close to 100%, this game will be over Sooner than expected. Michigan knocked Clemson out in the first round because the Tigers couldn’t shoot straight. Oklahoma won’t miss all those open shots and second-chance shots. Michigan will have to hit close to 50% of their shots to stay in this one and connect on 8 or more treys. If Griffin isn’t at full strength, then this game becomes much closer and moves toward being a tossup.
Prediction: Oklahoma 72 Michigan 63
West Region
Connecticut (12) vs. Texas A&M (2) [Connecticut has a schedule 2 points per game stronger]: We certainly hope UConn head coach Jim Calhoun is feeling much better, but we must begin to wonder if this could be his final year with the Huskies. Maybe his players are beginning to think the same, and they want to make sure he goes out a champion. It may or may not be the case, and they may or may not have the horses to go the distance, but the Huskies have enough in the tank to eliminate the Aggies.
Prediction: Connecticut 79 Texas A&M 73
Purdue (6) vs. Washington (9) [Washington has a schedule 1 point per game stronger]: Purdue struggled with Northern Iowa, while Washington quickly dismissed Mississippi State. We believe the Huskies will advance to the Sweet 16 to take on Connecticut in a game that will bring back memories for the fans and coaches of both schools.
Prediction: Washington 70 Purdue 60
Maryland (1) vs. Memphis (19) [Maryland has a schedule 2 points per game stronger]: Was Memphis playing a weak schedule all year when they ran up such a far record? Are they the most overrated team since all those consecutive Depaul teams that lost in the first round when they were ranked number one or two in the nation? We think not. They ran into a tough team in the first round. Maryland played a fantastic first game against Cal, and they could easily play another great one against Coach Cal. In what we believe will be one of the most exciting games of the entire tournament, we’ll stick with the team we are picking to still be playing on April 6.
Prediction Memphis 72 Maryland 71
March 17, 2009
PiRate Bracketnomics: 12 Teams Can Win It All
PiRate Bracketnomics: 12 Teams Can Win It All
We hope you took time to read Tuesday’s Bracketnomics 505 course. You need to read that first to understand the criteria used here at PiRate Central.
Using said criteria devised by our founder, we have isolated 12 teams capable of winning six games in the NCAA Tournament.
Unlike last year when there were four dominant teams, the dominance is diluted somewhat this season. Last year, more than 10 teams could be immediately eliminated based on a negative R+T rating. This season, only two teams (Mississippi State and Ohio State) fail to possess a positive R+T rating. Thus, we will pick the Bulldogs’ and Buckeyes’ opponents to beat them.
Here is a look alphabetically at those 12 teams who best meet the criteria showing they are capable of going all the way.
Connecticut: The Huskies outscore their opposition by an average of 13.3 points per game. They shoot 9.3% better than their opponents. They own a rebounding margin of 8.4. Their R+T is 7.6. In most years, this would be good enough for a Sweet 16 berth and possible Elite 8 run. This year, it is good enough to get them to the title game. The Huskies will win their first game by as many as they want. They will win game two rather easily. In the Sweet 16, they could run into a bump if they face Washington, but they will clobber Purdue if the Boilermakers make it to Glendale, Arizona. An Elite 8 match against either Missouri or Memphis will be a tough and exciting game.
Duke: The Blue Devils outscore their opposition by an average of 12.2 points per game. They shoot only 1.8% better than the opposition, and that is their one weakness. They out-rebound their opponents by 3 and have a 4.4 turnover margin, so they usually benefit with more scoring attempts. Their R+T of 12 is good enough to get them through the first two rounds. In the Sweet 16, they will face either UCLA, Villanova, or Virginia Commonwealth. The Blue Devils would be expected to beat any of these three, but it wouldn’t be a cinch. The Bruins also make this list.
Kansas: The defending National Champions are considerably weaker this year, but in a season where the NCAA is weaker, the Jayhawks have a shot at getting to Detroit. Kansas outscores its opponents by 11.3 points per game. They outshoot them by 9.1%, which is one of the best in the Dance. They have a 7.3 rebounding advantage. Their weakness is in turnover margin. They don’t commit a bevy of turnovers, but they don’t force many this year. That could hurt them if they face a team that can steal the ball. Syracuse and Missouri exploited them in regular season victories. A trip to the Sweet 16 is expected, but I think they could be in for a big shock in their first round game with North Dakota State. It may take 36 minutes for KU to put this game away. If they face Michigan State in a regional semi-final, the Jayhawks should win a tough, physical game. Louisville might be too much to handle in an Elite 8 regional final.
Louisville: Rick Pitino has taken Providence and Kentucky to the Final Four. Last year, he came close with UL. This year, it looks like the Cardinals have the horses to make it to Detroit. UL outscores their opposition by 12.3 points per game. They shoot 5.8% better than their opponents. They have a 2.5 rebounding advantage, a 2.7 turnover margin, and they average 9.3 steals per game. Their R+T is 8.5. Except for scoring margin, none of the other stats are dominant, but then again all of them are really good. They have no weaknesses.
Memphis: Memphis wouldn’t normally qualify because they are not a member of one of the big six conferences. However, the Tigers’ schedule was as strong as teams like Wake Forest and UCLA. Just like last year, Memphis has what it takes to play six games in the tournament. The Tigers outscore their opponents by 17.2 points per game, which qualifies them for elite dominance. They shoot 8.1% better than their opposition. Their rebounding margin is 6.2, and their turnover margin is 3.3. They average 8.8 steals per game, and their R+T rating is a whopping 13.2. This is a team that should cruise to the Elite 8, and then we would favor them over Connecticut. Missouri could be a tough out in the Sweet 16, but the Tigers fit the criteria of a national champion.
Missouri: Coach Mike Anderson was an assistant at Arkansas when the Razorbacks made won the national title in 1994 and made it to the finals in 1995. His Missouri Tigers play the same 40-minute, full-court game that Arkansas played in those days. These type of teams can make up for so-so rebounding with exceptional turnover margin by way of steals. The Tigers are a force to be reckoned with this year. Missouri outscores their opponents by 14.6 points per game. They outshoot them by 5.7%. While they barely win the battle of the boards by an average of 0.4 per game, their turnover margin is 6.5, and they average a tournament best 10.6 steals per game. With an R+T rating of 16.9, Missouri gets many chances to go on scoring runs. In tight tournament games, as little as an 8-0 run in two minutes is enough to decide the game. We like MU’s chances of winning their first two and getting to the Sweet 16. They will have to face Memphis, and they will meet a team that can neutralize the press. Although we believe Memphis will win and move on to the Final Four, Missouri just may be the toughest competition Memphis faces before Detroit.
North Carolina: We see the Tar Heels joining Memphis in Detroit. UNC has the second best looking criteria after Memphis. The Tar Heels outscore their opponents by an average of 17.4 points per game. They shoot 6.5% better than they allow. Their rebound margin is 7.3, and their turnover margin is 3.2. The Heels average 8.5 steals per game, and their R+T is 13.8. Their path to the Final Four is the easiest of any of the 12 teams listed here. Radford will be little more than a scrimmage against the Tar Heel scrubs. Neither LSU nor Butler has what it takes to beat them in round two. Gonzaga could compete for a long time, but the Tar Heels would eventually overpower them. In the region finals, UNC would handle Oklahoma, Clemson, Syracuse, or Arizona State. The only thing that could keep the Tar Heels out of the Final Four is the injury to Ty Lawson. If he can play up to his normal standards, we just cannot see another South Regional team beating them.
Pittsburgh: The Panthers defeated Connecticut twice but lost to Louisville. They should be able to beat almost any team that tries to play physically against them, but they could run into trouble against fast teams that can score in transition. Pitt outscores their opponents by 13.3 points per game. They shoot 7.3% better than they allow. Their rebounding margin of 9.8 is awesome, and their turnover margin of 1.1 further allows them extra scoring chances. They average 7.1 steals per game, and their R+T rating is 11.7. This is a team very capable of making it to Detroit. They will handle East Tennessee with ease in round one and give their regulars ample rest. Their round two game is going to be interesting, as both Tennessee and Oklahoma State have the necessary tools to aggravate the Panthers (much like the way Louisville did). We still believe Pitt can get by either team and make the Sweet 16. Their four possible Sweet 16 opponents do not have the skills to beat them, so if Pittsburgh gets to the Sweet 16, they will advance to the Elite 8 as well. A regional final game against Duke would be a terrific game with both teams having a 50% chance of winning. Ditto is they face Villanova, but the Panthers have revenge on their side in a match against the Wildcats.
U C L A: This edition of Bruins is nothing like the last three editions in the Big Dance. This UCLA team looks more like one of the Bruin teams from the Gary Cunningham/Larry Farmer/Walt Hazard years. UCLA outscores their opponents by 12.7 points per game. They shoot 4.9% better than they allow. Their rebounding margin is 3.8, and their turnover margin is 3.6. They steal the ball 8.4 times per game, and their R+T is 11.1. Much like Louisville, the Bruins don’t really dominate in any phase, but they are really good in all phases. As a 6-seed, they are not expected to make it past the field of 32, but it wouldn’t surprise us one bit if Ben Howland guides them back to the Elite 8. Their first round game against VCU should be nip and tuck for a long time. VCU won’t be able to rebound against them, and the Bruins should get enough offensive boards to win. In the second round, we believe UCLA can upset Villanova. They won’t get by Duke if they must play them for a trip to the Final Four, but an Elite 8 appearance would be a great accomplishment in a rebuilding season.
Wake Forest: The Demon Deacons are the third ACC team with a good shot of advancing deep into the tournament. Wake outscores their opponents by an average of 11.1 points per game. They shoot the ball 9.3% better than they allow. Their rebounding margin is 6. Their 0.2 turnover margin is basically nil, but they do average 8.5 steals per game. Their R+T rating is just 6.4 due to the fact that they tend to become turnover prone occasionally. The Demon Deacons received a favorable draw for the opening weekend. We see them moving on to the Sweet 16, but they will face a Louisville team that just may be too much in the third round. It should be a great game.
West Virginia: This team looks much like many of Bob Huggins’ Cincinnati teams. The Mountaineers are the polar opposite of the team that made a run under former coach John Beilein. They are a dark horse team to make a deep run. WVU outscores their opponents by 10.8 points per game. They only outshoot those opponents by 1.1%, and that will eventually be their downfall. They own healthy rebounding (5.9) and turnover (3.6) margins. They average just 6.8 steals per game, but their R+T rating is 11.8. This team will fly under the radar, but the Mountaineers could upset Kansas in the second round. If they can upset the Jayhawks, West Virginia has the horses to make it to Detroit. They lost twice to Louisville, by six and three points, so they can even upset the Cardinals given a third chance. We give WVU a 45% chance of beating Kansas and a 33% chance of advancing to the Elite 8.
Predictions For Bracketeers
This is a pressure-filled year for us. How can we match the success of our founder? Hopefully, we can do so by carefully following his theories and data. Plus, we talked to him, and he endorsed our picks.
So, here goes. In the East, three Pittsburgh, Duke, and UCLA all score 14 points in the criteria. Duke and Pitt have stronger schedules, so we will call for the Blue Devils and Panthers to meet in the Elite 8. We give a slight edge to Coach K’s troops, but that is almost negligible. We do not see the East Regional winner winning the national championship.
In the South, North Carolina is overpowering. The Tar Heels have no rival in this bracket. Second seed Oklahoma and third seed Syracuse do not qualify for a spot in the top 12. Fourth seed Gonzaga does qualify, and we will pick the Bulldogs to be the only team capable of stopping the Tar Heels. We give Gonzaga a 15-20% chance of winning in this probable regional semifinal game. North Carolina should then dispose of the East Regional Champion and advance to the title game.
In the Midwest, top-seed Louisville will have to dispose of defending champ Kansas to make the Final Four. Fourth-seed Wake Forest cannot be ignored here. Six-seed West Virginia can compete with anybody in this region, making the Midwest the strongest region overall. We’re going to go with Huggy Bear and his West Virginia Mountaineers to sneak into the Final Four.
Memphis should emerge in the West, besting Missouri and then Connecticut in Glendale, Arizona. The Tigers will then take care of business in the Final Four semifinal round to take on North Carolina.
In the National Championship Game, we look for Coach Cal to finally get his championship trophy. We are picking Memphis to make up for their final minute lapse in the 2008 Championship Game and win the title this year. It could be the start of a major dynasty, as the Tigers have an awesome group of recruits coming in for 2010.
The Stats On All The Teams
When you see a stat in bold, it meets the minimum amount to qualify for an exceptional stat. When you see it also underlined, it strongly meets the qualifying amount. When it is also in italics, it is a dominating statistic. Strength of Schedule (SOS) is used solely when pitting one team against another.
Team |
Pts |
FG% |
Reb |
TO |
Stl |
R+T |
SOS |
Akron |
7.0 |
1.9 |
-0.9 |
4.1 |
7.7 |
6.7 |
48.91 |
Alabama St. |
6.1 |
7.5 |
1.2 |
-0.8 |
5.6 |
0.1 |
40.46 |
American |
6.1 |
7.2 |
2.9 |
0.4 |
5.4 |
3.4 |
46.85 |
Arizona |
3.8 |
3.9 |
2.5 |
-0.7 |
6.0 |
1.5 |
56.79 |
Arizona St. |
9.4 |
7.3 |
1.7 |
0.6 |
5.9 |
2.5 |
56.35 |
Binghamton |
3.4 |
2.9 |
-1.6 |
1.5 |
7.0 |
0.9 |
46.95 |
Boston College |
4.4 |
2.3 |
2.9 |
-0.8 |
6.2 |
1.7 |
55.16 |
B Y U |
12.7 |
8.5 |
4.2 |
2.5 |
7.2 |
8.5 |
54.62 |
Butler |
10.2 |
5.7 |
3.3 |
0.9 |
6.1 |
4.6 |
53.15 |
Cal St. Northridge |
3.8 |
3.7 |
3.6 |
-0.4 |
9.0 |
2.7 |
48.83 |
California |
6.7 |
4.5 |
2.3 |
0.5 |
4.9 |
2.9 |
56.00 |
Chattanooga |
0.8 |
0.6 |
3.3 |
-1.1 |
6.3 |
1.6 |
49.33 |
Clemson |
10.8 |
3.5 |
1.6 |
2.9 |
9.4 |
8.1 |
56.07 |
Cleveland St. |
7.2 |
2.6 |
0.6 |
3.5 |
8.7 |
7.9 |
52.27 |
Connecticut |
13.3 |
9.3 |
8.4 |
-0.6 |
5.8 |
7.6 |
57.42 |
Cornell |
9.8 |
6.4 |
3.1 |
0.8 |
6.7 |
4.4 |
45.31 |
Dayton |
6.0 |
3.2 |
5.3 |
1.0 |
6.3 |
6.8 |
53.19 |
Duke |
12.2 |
1.8 |
3.0 |
4.4 |
8.5 |
12.0 |
60.86 |
E T S U |
8.6 |
6.2 |
1.5 |
2.5 |
8.5 |
6.6 |
46.28 |
Florida St. |
4.1 |
4.6 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
8.5 |
1.3 |
58.22 |
Gonzaga |
17.6 |
12.0 |
3.6 |
3.9 |
7.5 |
10.6 |
53.21 |
Illinois |
8.0 |
6.6 |
0.1 |
1.3 |
5.8 |
1.9 |
57.56 |
Kansas |
11.3 |
9.1 |
7.3 |
-0.8 |
6.9 |
6.0 |
58.01 |
Louisville |
12.3 |
5.8 |
2.5 |
2.7 |
9.3 |
8.5 |
58.80 |
L S U |
9.4 |
4.2 |
5.6 |
4.2 |
7.6 |
13.3 |
53.66 |
Marquette |
8.5 |
0.5 |
1.7 |
3.6 |
7.9 |
8.5 |
55.87 |
Maryland |
3.0 |
0.5 |
-1.6 |
3.2 |
7.7 |
4.3 |
58.11 |
Memphis |
17.2 |
8.1 |
6.2 |
3.3 |
8.8 |
13.2 |
55.82 |
Michigan |
4.1 |
-1.1 |
-3.1 |
2.4 |
6.5 |
0.6 |
58.74 |
Michigan St. |
9.0 |
4.1 |
9.9 |
-0.2 |
6.4 |
9.6 |
59.48 |
Minnesota |
5.4 |
4.4 |
2.4 |
0.6 |
8.4 |
3.6 |
56.65 |
Mississippi St. |
6.0 |
4.3 |
-0.7 |
-0.8 |
7.0 |
-2.0 |
55.62 |
Missouri |
14.6 |
5.7 |
0.4 |
6.5 |
10.6 |
16.9 |
56.31 |
Morehead St. |
3.1 |
2.3 |
8.0 |
-2.5 |
6.7 |
4.0 |
48.59 |
Morgan St. |
5.3 |
2.2 |
3.9 |
2.0 |
6.6 |
7.1 |
44.96 |
North Carolina |
17.4 |
6.5 |
7.3 |
3.2 |
8.5 |
13.8 |
58.00 |
North Dakota St. |
12.2 |
4.0 |
4.5 |
2.2 |
7.1 |
8.2 |
45.05 |
Northern Iowa |
4.2 |
3.6 |
3.1 |
-0.9 |
4.2 |
2.2 |
53.53 |
Ohio St. |
5.1 |
7.5 |
-1.0 |
0.1 |
5.9 |
-0.9 |
57.80 |
Oklahoma |
11.4 |
9.1 |
5.6 |
-1.1 |
6.9 |
3.8 |
57.78 |
Oklahoma St. |
6.9 |
1.4 |
-1.1 |
2.8 |
7.7 |
4.1 |
59.57 |
Pittsburgh |
13.3 |
7.3 |
9.8 |
1.1 |
7.1 |
11.7 |
59.27 |
Portland St. |
5.5 |
0.3 |
0.9 |
0.7 |
7.5 |
2.2 |
45.45 |
Purdue |
10.3 |
5.8 |
-0.3 |
3.5 |
7.2 |
5.7 |
57.48 |
Radford |
5.1 |
7.2 |
6.9 |
-2.8 |
6.8 |
2.3 |
47.63 |
Robert Morris |
5.7 |
5.1 |
1.7 |
0.7 |
8.6 |
3.1 |
46.18 |
Siena |
7.6 |
3.7 |
-0.5 |
3.8 |
8.8 |
7.5 |
54.68 |
USC |
4.9 |
6.8 |
5.5 |
-1.1 |
6.3 |
3.8 |
58.04 |
Stephen F Austin |
10.3 |
7.2 |
1.4 |
2.8 |
6.1 |
5.5 |
46.99 |
Syracuse |
8.8 |
7.5 |
2.2 |
-0.6 |
8.0 |
1.0 |
59.39 |
Temple |
5.6 |
4.2 |
3.1 |
-0.8 |
5.6 |
2.0 |
56.16 |
Tennessee |
6.1 |
1.5 |
4.6 |
1.8 |
6.7 |
7.5 |
60.50 |
Texas |
6.8 |
3.6 |
4.7 |
1.3 |
6.2 |
6.6 |
56.58 |
Texas A&M |
5.4 |
1.5 |
5.3 |
-0.3 |
5.0 |
4.9 |
55.77 |
U C L A |
12.7 |
4.9 |
3.8 |
3.6 |
8.4 |
11.1 |
55.06 |
Utah |
7.2 |
7.5 |
4.9 |
-3.2 |
5.0 |
1.1 |
57.90 |
Utah St. |
10.8 |
7.8 |
7.0 |
-0.7 |
4.9 |
6.2 |
51.00 |
Villanova |
9.5 |
5.3 |
4.1 |
2.1 |
8.0 |
8.1 |
57.30 |
Virginia Common. |
8.6 |
6.6 |
-0.6 |
1.9 |
7.6 |
2.9 |
51.94 |
Wake Forest |
11.1 |
9.3 |
6.0 |
0.2 |
8.5 |
6.4 |
55.29 |
Washington |
9.3 |
3.8 |
8.4 |
0.1 |
7.6 |
8.6 |
58.08 |
West Virginia |
10.8 |
1.1 |
5.9 |
3.6 |
6.8 |
11.8 |
58.84 |
Western Kentucky |
5.4 |
1.5 |
4.8 |
0.1 |
5.7 |
4.9 |
51.41 |
Wisconsin |
5.4 |
0.1 |
3.0 |
1.4 |
5.0 |
4.7 |
58.28 |
Xavier |
10.0 |
7.4 |
8.4 |
-2.2 |
5.4 |
5.5 |
55.89 |
Round One Games
(numbers in parentheses are PiRate Criteria scores)
East Region
#1 Pittsburgh (14) vs. #16 East Tennessee (6) [Pitt has a schedule 13 points per game stronger]: This game will be over quickly. Pitt will dominate inside and put this one away in the first 10 minutes. It could be a 20-point margin before halftime.
Prediction: Pittsburgh 78 East Tennessee 56
#8 Oklahoma State (0) vs. #9 Tennessee (6) [Tennessee has a schedule 1 point per game stronger]: These teams are similar, but Tennessee has just a little more talent than the Cowboys. The Volunteers should win the battle of the boards by five or more, and the two or three extra offensive put-backs should decide this game.
Prediction: Tennessee 82 Oklahoma State 77
#5 Florida State (0) vs. #12 Wisconsin (2) [Schedule strengths are equal]: 12-Seeds are the ones that tend to draw the most attention at first round upsets. Part of the reason is because 12-seeds are usually the last bubble teams to make the tournament. Frequently, they are quite a bit better than their seeding. This doesn’t apply in this game. Wisconsin is lucky to be an invitee. The reason the Badgers have a 50-50 chance of winning this one is the fact that Florida State isn’t a dominating ACC team. They rely on one big scorer, and they win games by one to six points. The winner of this game will be going home after the next one, and we’ll go with the Badgers to win a close one.
Prediction: Wisconsin 68 Florida State 66
#4 Xavier (8) vs. #13 Portland State (1) [Xavier has a schedule 10 points per game stronger]: Xavier would have qualified among the big dozen if they had a positive turnover margin. The Musketeers don’t have the tools to advance to the Elite 8 and will only crack the Sweet 16 due to a weak second round opponent. This Portland State team is nowhere near as talented as last year’s team. That team had a chance to compete, while this years Vikings will know they are done by halftime of this game.
Prediction: Xavier 79 Portland State 62
#6 U C L A (14) vs. #11 Virginia Commonwealth (3) [UCLA has a schedule 3 points per game stronger]: VCU is one of those pesky teams that can throw an opponent off its game. Coach Anthony Grant may be on his way to a big time job after this game. UCLA will be able to sneak up on opponents in this tournament. The Bruins didn’t win the Pac-10 title this year, but they have the talent to still be playing in April. After a beginning that could be ugly, look for the boys from Westwood to get their balance and cruise to a double digit win.
Prediction: UCLA 75 VCU 65
#3 Villanova (9) vs. #14 American (2) [Villanova has a schedule 10 points per game stronger]: Villanova just barely missed out on being included in the top 12. The Wildcats are not far behind Louisville, Connecticut, and Pittsburgh in the Big East. VU has no weaknesses, but they are not as strong across the board as Louisville. American won both the Patriot League regular season and tournament titles. This is their second consecutive trip to the tournament, and they enter riding a 13-game winning streak. They are better than average in every important aspect, but the Eagles’ strength of schedule is not strong enough for that to matter. They played three good teams this year and lost to all by an average of 23 points.
Prediction: Villanova 74 American 55
#7 Texas (3) vs. #10 Minnesota (1) [Schedule strengths are equal]: Neither of these teams is going to advance past the opening weekend. Texas is above average but not great in every aspect. There are a dozen NIT teams that could beat the Longhorns. Minnesota isn’t much better. The Gophers pick up more steals, but they don’t capitalize on them with quick scoring bursts. We’ll take Texas in a close game, but the Longhorns will not advance farther than one round.
Prediction: Texas 72 Minnesota 66
#2 Duke (14) vs. #15 Binghamton (-1) [Duke has a schedule 14 points per game stronger]: This won’t be like Duke’s first round game in 2008, when they had to sweat out a last second shot attempt by tiny Belmont. Binghamton has little inside game, and that’s what it will take to beat Duke. The Blue Devils will wear down the Bearcats and pull away to a lopsided victory. They could lead by 35 to 40 points before emptying the bench.
Prediction: Duke 91 Binghamton 63
South Region
#1 North Carolina (17) vs. #16 Radford (3) [North Carolina has a schedule 10 points per game stronger]: Radford can score a lot of points. They don’t have much depth, and we can see them keeping this game close maybe until midway through the first half. After that, we look for the Tar Heels to go on a big run and put the game away before halftime. Don’t be alarmed if UNC doesn’t win by 30 or more points. Remember, they barely beat James Madison in the opening round one year when they advanced to the title game.
Prediction: North Carolina 94 Radford 77
#8 L S U (14) vs. #9 Butler (7) [LSU has a schedule 1 point per game stronger]: As 8-9 games are supposed to go, this game should be close with numerous lead changes. Earlier in the year, Butler won at Xavier, while LSU lost at home to Xavier. The Tigers know they are facing a team that could easily beat them. They just barely missed qualifying for a spot on the 12 best teams. Butler was better last year, but the Bulldogs are no pushover. LSU will be extended to the end, and the Tigers will be fortunate to escape with a victory.
Prediction: LSU 73 Butler 69
#5 Illinois (4) vs. #12 Western Kentucky (2) [Illinois has a schedule 6 points per game stronger]: This Western Kentucky team is about 10 points weaker than last season’s Sweet 16 team. However, the Hilltoppers couldn’t have asked for a better #5 seed to face in the first game. This one has the look of another 12-seed upset, but we will select the Illini to hold off a tough rally.
Prediction: Illinois 61 Western Kentucky 58
#4 Gonzaga (19) vs. #13 Akron (3) [Gonzaga has a schedule 4 points per game stronger]: If Gonzaga were in the Pac-10 and had the identical stats they have this year, we would place them in the Final Four. This is probably a better team than the Adam Morrison team a few years back. The ‘Zags finished the season marching through the opposition like Sherman marched through Georgia. In their final seven games, Gonzaga won all seven by an average score of 84-56! Akron isn’t a bad team. The MAC conference tournament champs might be favored in a first round game in other years, but they are going up against the North Carolina of the mid-majors. Better luck next time Zips.
Prediction: Gonzaga 80 Akron 67
#6 Arizona State (4) vs. #11 Temple (0) [Schedule strengths are equal]: Arizona State lost four of its final seven games, while Temple won 10 of its last 12 including the Atlantic 10 Tournament title. Even though the Sun Devils own a better criteria score, we believe Temple should be a slight favorite in this game. Temple should control the boards in this game, and we expect a game with many missed shots. Offensive rebounding should decide this one.
Prediction: Temple 64 Arizona State 58
#3 Syracuse (4) vs. #14 Stephen F. Austin (8) [Syracuse has a schedule 12 points per game stronger]: Be warned! This game could be a nail-biter. Syracuse will not be fully recovered from the Big East Tournament. They may never fully recover the rest of this season. SFA is not a pushover, as judged by their criteria score. Their strength of schedule does not merit making them an upset favorite. They could keep this one close. However, being their first tourney appearance, the players will be tight at the beginning of the game. Syracuse may not bring their A-game, but it will be enough to win. Don’t expect the Orangemen to score 80 points in this game, but then again, don’t expect the Lumberjacks to get many second-chance scoring opportunities.
Prediction: Syracuse 69 Stephen F. Austin 59
#7 Clemson (9) vs. #10 Michigan (-4) [Michigan has a schedule 3 points per game stronger]: John Beilein’s West Virginia team is the only Elite 8 team to fall through the PiRate cracks in recent years. This Michigan team plays much like that one, but the Wolverines are not yet as good. Michigan tries to limit possessions and win by hitting a lot more three-pointers than they give up. It is a good gimmick when you don’t have superior talent. We just don’t see it working in the Big Dance. Their criteria score is -4, which is the worst of the 63 teams that have a positive R+T rating. Clemson was a better team in 2008, and that Tiger team fell to Villanova in the first round. We expect the Tigers to get over the hump and win their opening round game this year.
Prediction: Clemson 77 Michigan 66
#2 Oklahoma (9) vs. #15 Morgan State (4) [Oklahoma has a schedule 13 points per game stronger]: Oklahoma would have qualified for a spot in the top 12 if they had a positive turnover margin. When they face a team that forced turnovers, the Sooners are going to have a rough time. Missouri and Oklahoma State beat the Sooners in the last two weeks, and both of those teams are ball-hawking squads. Morgan State is not capable of forcing Oklahoma into a bevy of turnovers, so OU is safe in the opening round. Sooner fans should root like crazy for Michigan to beat Clemson, because the Tigers are a lot like Missouri and Oklahoma State.
Prediction: Oklahoma 79 Morgan State 65
Midwest Region
#1 Louisville (10) vs. #16 Morehead State (1) [Louisville has a schedule 10 points per game stronger]: These two teams met in December with UL winning by 38 points. The Eagles are much better than they were three months ago, but not 38 points better. Louisville will get a light workout in this game, and that will keep them fresh for round two.
Prediction: Louisville 76 Morehead State 49
#8 Ohio State (DNQ) vs. #9 Siena (5) [Ohio State has a schedule 3 points per game stronger]: Here is what looks like a mild upset in the making. Ohio State is one of two teams that fail to qualify due to a negative R+T rating. What that means is the Buckeyes give up more scoring opportunities than they get. Think of a major league baseball team that wins 90 games in the regular season to qualify for the playoffs but gives up one more hit per game than themselves while hitting an average amount of home runs. That team won’t go far in the playoffs. Siena won an opening round game in last year’s tournament, and this Saints’ team is better this year than last year. Siena stands a 55-60% chance of winning this game.
Prediction: Siena 74 Ohio State 70
#5 Utah (3) vs. #12 Arizona (-2) [Utah has a schedule 1 point per game stronger]: The winner of this game won’t be advancing much further. Arizona really shouldn’t be here. Almost every major conference team and more than half of the mid-major teams in the NIT could beat Arizona. Utah won 11 of their final 13 games, and the Utes should make it 12 of 14. However, don’t expect any deep runs like in the Rick Majerus or Jack Gardner days.
Prediction: Utah 68 Arizona 63
#4 Wake Forest (12) vs. #13 Cleveland State (7) [Wake Forest has a schedule 3 points per game stronger]: Cleveland State deserves their seeding. The Vikings defeated Butler and won at Syracuse during the season and played competitive games at Washington and at West Virginia. Wake Forest qualifies as one of the super 12 teams, and they will have a tougher time with CSU in the opening round than they will have with either Utah or Arizona in round two.
Prediction: Wake Forest 69 Cleveland State 62
#6 West Virginia (16) vs. #11 Dayton (5) [West Virginia has a schedule 6 points per game stronger]: West Virginia is the top dark horse in our criteria. We believe they can advance to Detroit. Dayton is a solid team and can hold their own on the glass against the Mountaineers. We believe the game will be decided by turnovers. WVU will force three to five more and capitalize on that differential with five to eight points. We will add a little more to the difference by believing Dayton will put West Virginia at the line several times in the closing minutes and fail to score quickly at their end.
Prediction: West Virginia 74 Dayton 65
#3 Kansas (10) vs. #14 North Dakota State (10) [Kansas has a schedule 13 points per game stronger]: North Dakota State is making an appearance in the Big Dance in their first year they are qualified. Their criteria score is a little misleading, as they have a rather weak strength of schedule. The Bison may give the Jayhawks a battle through a couple of TV timeouts, but KU will go to the locker at the half up by at least eight and pull away in the second half.
Prediction: Kansas 81 North Dakota State 59
#7 Boston College (-2) vs. #10 Southern California (2) [Southern Cal has a schedule 3 points per game stronger]: This should be an interesting and entertaining game. The winner should be out of the tournament one round later. Trying to pick a winner in this game is a pure crap shoot. Boston College beat North Carolina and lost to Harvard. USC started 10-3, then lost 9 of 15, and then won five in a row, including three consecutive Pac-10 Tournament victories over NCAA Tournament teams.
Prediction: Southern Cal 73 Boston College 70
#2 Michigan State (7) vs. #15 Robert Morris (2) [Michigan State has a schedule 13 points per game stronger]: The Spartans should make it to the Sweet 16, but we just don’t see any Big 10 team winning an Elite 8 game this year. Robert Morris must rely on one star in Jeremy Chappell. The Colonials don’t rebound well, and MSU will play volleyball on the offensive glass.
Prediction: Michigan State 76 Robert Morris 54
West Regional
#1 Connecticut (12) vs. #16 Chattanooga (-1) [Connecticut has a schedule 8 points per game stronger]: We pity the poor Mocs. They are going to be the victims of one of the two most lopsided opening round game. UConn will dominate this game from start to finish. Chattanooga will be lucky to lead this one 2-0 at the start, because it could easily be a game where the Huskies hold the Mocs scoreless to the first TV timeout and lead by double digits by the time Chattanooga scores.
Prediction: Connecticut 98 Chattanooga 63
#8 B Y U (13) vs. #9 Texas A&M (2) [Texas A&M has a schedule 1 point per game stronger]: This looks like another excellent tossup game, but our criteria show it to be a one-sided affair. BYU would belong in the top 12 if they had played a stronger schedule. The Cougars do everything well; they outscore their opposition by 12.7 points per game. They shoot 8.5% better than their opponents. They control the boards by more than 4 per game and force 2.5 more turnovers per game than they commit. The Cougars just haven’t beaten a big time team. Texas A&M owns victories over four major teams in the Dance. That makes it the tossup game it is supposed to be.
Prediction: BYU 74 Texas A&M 69
#5 Purdue (6) vs. #12 Northern Iowa (-1) [Purdue has a schedule 4 points per game stronger]: The Boilermakers split their final 10 regular season games before finding their stride in the Big 10 Tournament. Northern Iowa is in the Dance because they can edge Illinois State every time they face off. Illinois State won’t be on the schedule until next season, so NIU can begin looking forward to next season after this game. Don’t expect Purdue to still be around next week. This is going to prove to be another weak year for the Big 10.
Prediction: Purdue 71 Northern Iowa 60
#4 Washington (9) vs. #13 Mississippi State (DNQ) [Washington has a schedule 2 points per game stronger]: The Pac-10 regular season champions take on the surprise winner of the SEC Tournament. MSU is one of two teams that do not qualify due to a negative R+T number. It’s hard to imagine that with Jarvis Varnado in the lineup, the Bulldogs still have a slight negative rebounding margin. They also have a negative turnover margin and didn’t play that tough of a schedule. Washington won’t have to travel far from Seattle to Portland, and the Huskies should win this one by more points than most people expect.
Prediction: Washington 81 Mississippi State 66
#6 Marquette (9) vs. #11 Utah State (10) [Marquette has a schedule 5 points per game stronger]: Marquette would definitely be included in the top 12 if Dominic James were not out for the season. Prior to his foot fracture, MU was a Top 10 team capable of making a run to the Final Four. Without him, they really should be a double digit seed. Utah State is one of the handful of mid-majors capable of making a run to the Sweet 16. The Aggies will have trouble against an aggressive, pressing team, but Marquette isn’t one of those teams. This game is actually a tossup. With no partiality to an in-state team, we’re going with Marquette to survive a toughie.
Prediction: Marquette 70 Utah State 65
#3 Missouri (14) vs. #14 Cornell (5) [Missouri has a schedule 11 points per game stronger]: Missouri has the talent to make a deep run in this tournament. Any team that has trouble facing pressure defense is going to find itself in a heap of trouble. The Tigers are the best pressing team in the Big Dance and the only team averaging double figure steals per game. If Mizzou gets 12 steals in a game, they are going to score 20 or more points off those steals. That is a mighty stat for an opponent to overcome. Cornell is not as good this year as they were last year when they won the Ivy League with ease. This team has no signature wins, and they lost by double digits to all three NCAA Tournament teams on their schedule.
Prediction: Missouri 82 Cornell 58
#7 California (1) vs. #10 Maryland (1) [Maryland has a schedule 2 points per game stronger]: On paper, this game looks like an exciting game. We consider it the most mediocre game of the opening round. One of these teams will advance to the Round of 32 and become fodder for Memphis. Cal will win the battle on the boards, but Maryland will not beat themselves with unforced errors. The Terps beat North Carolina and Wake Forest in the last month, while Cal has been a sub-.500 team since mid-January.
Prediction: Maryland 71 California 67
#2 Memphis (19) vs. #15 Cal State Northridge (-1) [Memphis has a schedule 7 points per game stronger]: Not only is Memphis coming into the tournament playing its best ball of the season, the Tigers enter the Dance with a chip on their shoulders. They deserved a number one seed, and now they will take it out on their next opponent or maybe next six. The Matadors lost to Cal State Bakersfield as well as some other teams with an RPI well down the list. Memphis has won 25 games in a row, and the Tigers are the real number one team in our book. At the point when Coach Cal removes his top eight players from the game, the Tigers may have yielded less than a point per minute in this game.
Prediction: Memphis 83 Cal State Northridge 47
Coming Friday, a look at Saturday’s games. Sunday’s game previews will run Saturday.