Finally, the PiRates had a week to celebrate. Playing strictly college games, it was quite a profitable week, albeit in imaginary currency.
Three of our five selections won, returning us $718 on our $500 invested for an ROI of 44% The weekly success almost squared us for the season, as we are now just $83 down on $1,700 invested. We are one additional successful week from possibly going from red to black figures for the season.
We have selected four parlays this week, all consisting of three-games apiece. We will be experimenting with additional options this week to test a theory put forth by a mathematics department head of a local university, and if this theory shows some merit, we will discuss it at length in the near future. For now, we will continue posting only money line parlays that give us better than +120 odds.
Every year, we look to see which games tend to give us the most success, and it is uncanny that two leagues tend to lead the way. Would you ever guess that the Sun Belt Conference and Mid-American Conference have given us more winners than any of the Power 5 leagues? Is it because these two leagues are more predictable, or is it because maybe the books do not always have the best gauge on these two conferences, and the numbers produce more favorable odds? Unfortunately, we do not have enough data saved to give us a factual answer. However, the percentages that we have saved tell us that we have a statistically important advantage when playing games among the MAC and SBC, so these two leagues will remain in the PiRate diet.
We will preface our picks for this week with the mild warning that we were not in 100% agreement on any of the picks this week, while we were solidly behind the three winning plays last week. In actuality, we were not in 100% agreement on any potential 3-team parlay that produced greater than +120 odds. The only parlay we all agreed on involved SIX games, at +205 odds. Six sure things are seldom 100% sure. It is most likely that one of the six could be upset, and our leader actually believes one of the six might be a great sides pick at +11 (off the record, he likes New Mexico State +11 vs. Appalachian State).
Here are our four parlays for the week.
#1@ +145 |
|
Must Win |
Must Lose |
Florida |
LSU |
TCU |
West Virginia |
Notre Dame |
North Carolina |
#2@ +138 |
|
Must Win |
Must Lose |
Syracuse |
Pittsburgh |
Michigan |
Michigan St. |
Marshall |
Charlotte |
#3@ +176 |
|
Must Win |
Must Lose |
Miami |
Florida St. |
UTSA |
Southern Miss |
Navy |
Air Force |
#4@ +130 |
|
Must Win |
Must Lose |
Akron |
Ball St. |
Idaho |
UL-Lafayette |
Ohio U |
Central Mich. |
Note–Once again, we are not issuing any NFL selections for the obvious reasons and the not-so-obvious reason that our NFL ratings have taken a 50%+ drop in readership. This speaks loudly, and I hope the NFL brass are paying attention at the mass media with similar drops in patronage.
It is our editorial opinion that the NFL needs to instate a rule outlawing all publicly political opinions and statements during their games, just like most other retail establishments. When you or we go to the grocery store to buy food, or go to your local insurance agent to renew your policies, none of us would expect to be issued any political litmus tests from either side of an issue, and we would quickly look elsewhere for our groceries or insurance if we did have to hear the employees and management deliver one-sided editorials, whether it was our identical belief or opposing belief.
The NFL will only continue to lose patronage if they allow politicization in any way, on any side. Football is just one of many avenues of entertainment. The NFL has fallen behind trail hiking, reading good books, going shopping with our loved ones, visiting friends, and doing inventory (ugh) in the households of the Pirates. The TVs have remained silent on Sundays and Monday nights. Worse for the NFL, we all have discovered a much more enjoyable end to our weekends by not watching the games, something that may become addictive long after the impasse has been retired. It takes a lot to win customers back after they have made the decision to leave. Many companies never succeed in returning to what they once were once they experienced a large migration away from their establishment.