The Pi-Rate Ratings

August 26, 2021

PiRate Picks For August 28, 2021

Welcome to all the newcomers to the PiRate Ratings site for the 2021-2022 football season. Saturday, we have the fortune of having a dress rehearsal for the college football season. Nine FBS teams will be in action, as one FBS team plays an FCS opponent.

The PiRate Ratings enjoy issuing picks against the spread or money line on Thursdays each week until January. Because we are most concerned with Money Line Parlays, there are only five options to combine games this week, and many of the books do not issue a line for FBS vs. FCS games. So, in a quest to obtain the best odds, there really are just four games.

This presents multiple issues that basically make it close to impossible to issue a real wager, because the options don’t fit our paradigm. Let’s take a look.

First, before we get started, you must know and understand one thing. We offer these selections purely for the fun of it. It is math and not gambling to us. We NEVER bet on sports. We play with a pretend bankroll that never runs out. We wager the same amount of fake currency on every selection–$100. It could just as easily be $5, $10, $1000, $5000, whatever, but $100 is an easy number and typical of many wagers in real life.

Second, we urge you with everything we can say about it to NOT use this weekly feature as betting advice, unless you have legitimate advice or are a professional, and then this becomes a secondary reference.

Third, we hunt around for the best possible odds on our pretend wagers. You may or may not be able to find the same odds we do, because you would have to search at the exact same time we do. Because, we are not limited to just the legal books available to us in our state of Tennessee, where betting is legal, we might pick a parlay based on a sports book that is only for people in Nevada, or New Jersey, or even off shore.

Okay, now that you know the ground rules, here is our specialty–Money Line Parlays. The money line is different from the spread of a game, but the number is the equivalent of a spread. If a team is favored by 7 points, their money line is going to be roughly -330, and if a team is a 7-point underdog, their money line is going to be roughly +250.

How does a Money Line work? If the line is a negative number, if you wager the amount of the negative number and win, you will receive $100 plus the amount you wagered. So, if you wager on a team at -300, and you bet $300, if the bet wins, you will get back $400 (your investment money plus $100). If you lose, you are out the $300. On the other hand, if the line is a positive number, you can win that amount of money with a $100 wager. So, if the line on a team is +300, you can wager $100, and if the team wins, you receive $400 (your investment money plus $300).

In Money Line wagers, all that matters is that the team you picked wins the game, be it by 1 point or 63 points. Obviously, if Alabama is playing Mercer, the odds are going to be such that to win $100, you will have to put up maybe $100,000. So, if you bet $100 on Alabama at -100000, when Alabama wins, you receive $100.01. Would you risk $100,000 to win one penny?

When you wager on more than one money line to win as one bet, this is called a parlay. Let’s say that you like Mississippi State to beat Arkansas and Oklahoma State to beat Texas Tech. Mississippi State’s money line number is -275. Oklahoma State’s money line number is -250. By combining these two wagers into one bet, with $100 riding on the outcome, instead of attempting to win a little more than $36 on MSU and $40 on OSU, by combining the two games into a parlay, you stand to win almost $91 if both teams win. If you bet them individually, you would only win $76, so by combining the two, you win $15 more. Of course, if one team wins and the other loses, your losses would be less by playing the games separately.

The question you most likely wanted to ask while reading the above paragraph is, “Why risk playing two separate games that both teams you selected must win and still not get even money?” Did you ask it? The answer to that question is, “You are correct; why wager $100 to just win $91 and then have to be right twice to cash it?” You can bet a regular game against the spread and get 11-10 odds, just a fraction better than the odds of the parlay above.

The ultimate answer is that we are only looking for parlays that pay better than even money. We really don’t want to play any parlays at less than +120 odds, where we would win $6 for every $5 wagered.

The next question you might have is, “Isn’t finding two teams to win and pay off at +120 going to require me to bet an underdog to win outright?”

Our answer to you is, “Yes, but we don’t look for many two-team money line parlays. Let’s take a look at another example with three teams.

Let’s say that we believe that Washington will beat Oregon State, and the money line is -260.

We also believe that Army will beat Temple, and the money line is -240.

And, we believe that Wisconsin will beat Purdue, and the money line is -250.

If you wager $100 on these three teams to win, and all three teams win, your payout is just under $175 plus the $100 you wagered for almost $275 ($274.62 to be exact.)

Let’s take a look at 5 wagers, where we win two and lose three at these odds

We bet $500 at $100 for 5 wagers.

On the two winning wagers, we receive $275 * 2 or $550.

Invest $500 and win $550 by being right 40% of the time. In one week, we have made a 10% return on an investment. What investment on the Stock Market makes a 10% gain in one week after you have paid the commissions on the trip?

Ah, but here’s the rub: how often can you wager on 5 money line parlays that average +175 and win 40% of the parlays? Most people fall into this trap and only win about one of five of these parlays. At 20% success, you lose $225 a week for a 45% loss. Now, where can you loses 45% in the stock market in one week? We put our real money in high-cap value stocks with durable competitive advantages, long histories of consistent increases in earnings, and long histories of consistent dividend payouts. The pretend money is just fine for football wagering.

By now, you want to know who we are picking in Week 0 of the college football season. Maybe, you have figured it out already. We don’t have any official picks this week, because there are not enough games to come up with a parlay better than +120.

Here is a practice parlay that is not an official pick, but shown here to show you what we mean.

The three games involved are: Nebraska versus Illinois, UCLA versus Hawaii, and UTEP versus New Mexico St.

Let’s say that we think Illinois will upset the Cornhuskers, UCLA will take care of Hawaii, and UTEP will win the big rivalry game.

Here are the three Money Lines for these three games.

Illinois +215 vs. Nebraska

UCLA -875 vs. Hawaii

UTEP -390 vs. New Mexico St.

This parlay calculates to +341. If we wager $100 on this game, and Illinois, UCLA, and UTEP all win, we receive $441 in our account (The $100 we wagered plus the $341 on the win).

Why isn’t this an official pick? We believe that Illinois might have been an excellent pick against the spread when the Illinois-Nebraska game spread opened at -9 1/2. But, it has come down to -6 1/2 as of this writing. Sharp money was wagers on Illinois +9 1/2, and also on Nebraska -6 1/2. A three-point middling is too good to be true. Playing both sides, the Sharps only need to have the game win both sides one out of every 19 times (5.26%) to make a profit. The spreads of 7, 8, and 9 account for 10.8% of all FBS college football games. That’s double the amount needed to make a profit. The key is the Sharps can find these spreads when they open. Also, playing the opening lines is the most effective way to win for a Sharp.

The UTEP-New Mexico State game is the biggest issue in this parlay. One axiom that older Sharps believe in is not to rely on a losing program to have to win for you to win. The Miners are probably a 3-9 team, which is almost a good year for this program. The Aggies are really weak and should be an underdog in every game, but this is their big rival, maybe bigger than playing New Mexico. The I-10 rivalry frequently is a tossup game.

Two out of three of these games are iffy. The chances that Illinois pulls off the upset of Nebraska are not good enough to have faith in this parlay winning. Scott Frost is in deep cow poo if the Cornhuskers don’t win at least six games and earn a bowl bid, and losing to the weakest Big Ten team will turn the heater on in his heated seat. This will be Bret Bielema’s first game as Illinois head coach, and he brought in an offensive coordinator that runs a system totally different from what the Illini ran under Lovie Smith. Expect growing pains.

We hope this gets you pumped for next week, when there will be more than enough games to play some parlays.

August 25, 2008

PiRate Ratings For College Football–Week of August 30, 2008

The PiRates Are Ready To Board Your Ship For 2008-2009

 

Ahoy there!  The PiRates have returned for another season of mayhem and mischief.  They are ready to pillage those nasty ships from Las Vegas and reap the booty to be had.  Okay, if they are like last year, they may wish to become greeters at the local Wal-Mart, but let’s hope that 2007 was a great aberration. 

 

As you may have read in a post last week, there has been a major change this year.  This blog will concentrate on Pro Football while providing the bare bones in college football.  I just don’t follow college football with a passion any more.  The BCS has turned me off the game.  They need to either go to playoffs like all other sports, or return to the old ways and not let something or someone determine (and almost always getting it wrong) which two teams will have the chance to become the champion.  If you talk to the top experts in the business, and you know who they live in Nevada, they would tell you that Southern Cal and West Virginia were the top two teams last year.  Both of them would have been favored against either LSU or Ohio State.  The criteria that the BCS uses are no more accurate than your average stock screening program. 

 

What I plan to do this year is provide an abbreviated college preview on Wednesday or Thursday and an in-depth NFL preview on Friday.  Once again, I will also carry a pro football computer simulation of NFL teams from yesteryear, and that will run on Mondays once the NFL season begins.

 

I have the preview for the first week of the college season, as time restraints will make it impossible to post on Wednesday or Thursday.

 

Preseason PiRate Top 25

NCAA FBS

 

                 Team            Rating

Won

Lost

1

Ohio St.

128.4

11

2

2

Florida 

126.9

9

4

3

Georgia 

124.0

11

2

4

Missouri

122.9

12

2

5

S. Florida

120.4

9

4

6

Auburn

120.3

9

4

7

Clemson

119.0

9

4

7

Oklahoma

119.0

11

3

9

Oregon

117.7

9

4

10

Southern Cal

117.4

11

2

10

Kansas

117.4

12

1

12

W. Virginia

117.4

11

2

13

L S U

117.3

12

2

14

S. Carolina

115.7

6

6

15

Texas Tech

115.2

9

4

16

Tennessee

114.7

10

4

16

Arizona St.

114.7

10

3

18

Wisconsin

113.3

9

4

19

Va. Tech

111.6

11

3

20

Penn St.

111.0

9

4

21

Texas

110.5

10

3

22

B Y U

109.9

11

2

23

Alabama

109.5

7

6

24

California

109.2

7

6

25

Kentucky

109.1

8

5

 

PiRate Ratings By Conference

 

Atlantic Coast Conference

Atlantic Division

 

 

 

 

 

Team

Conf.

Overall

Rating

Off

Def

Clemson

0-0

0-0

119.0

73

46

Florida State

0-0

0-0

108.5

65

44

Wake Forest

0-0

0-0

107.8

63

45

Maryland

0-0

0-0

106.9

68

39

Boston College

0-0

0-0

101.4

62

39

North Carolina St.

0-0

0-0

92.9

61

32

 

 

 

 

 

 

Coastal Division

 

 

 

 

 

Team

Conf.

Overall

Rating

Off

Def

Virginia Tech

0-0

0-0

111.6

71

41

North Carolina

0-0

0-0

105.6

68

38

Virginia 

0-0

0-0

99.2

61

38

Georgia Tech

0-0

0-0

97.5

62

36

Miami

0-0

0-0

96.3

58

38

Duke

0-0

0-0

95.7

62

34

 

Big East Conference

 

 

 

 

 

 

Team

Conf.

Overall

Rating

Off

Def

South Florida

0-0

0-0

120.4

76

44

West Virginia

0-0

0-0

117.4

76

41

Connecticut

0-0

0-0

108.7

67

42

Rutgers

0-0

0-0

108.0

66

42

Cincinnati

0-0

0-0

107.3

64

43

Pittsburgh

0-0

0-0

107.0

63

44

Louisville

0-0

0-0

99.4

64

35

Syracuse

0-0

0-0

91.4

56

35

 

Big Ten

 

 

 

 

 

 

Team

Conf.

Overall

Rating

Off

Def

Ohio State

0-0

0-0

128.4

74

54

Wisconsin

0-0

0-0

113.3

71

42

Penn State

0-0

0-0

111.0

67

44

Michigan State

0-0

0-0

107.3

67

40

Illinois

0-0

0-0

106.9

67

40

Michigan

0-0

0-0

103.9

62

42

Purdue

0-0

0-0

101.7

65

37

Northwestern

0-0

0-0

98.2

65

33

Iowa

0-0

0-0

97.3

62

35

Indiana

0-0

0-0

97.2

63

34

Minnesota

0-0

0-0

94.4

62

32

 

Big 12

North Division

 

 

 

 

 

Team

Conf.

Overall

Rating

Off

Def

Missouri

0-0

0-0

122.9

73

50

Kansas

0-0

0-0

117.4

69

48

Colorado

0-0

0-0

103.6

65

39

Kansas State

0-0

0-0

101.9

67

35

Nebraska

0-0

0-0

100.3

61

39

Iowa State

0-0

0-0

92.2

56

36

South Division

 

 

 

 

 

Team

Conf.

Overall

Rating

Off

Def

Oklahoma

0-0

0-0

119.0

77

42

Texas Tech

0-0

0-0

115.2

75

40

Texas

0-0

0-0

110.5

71

40

Okla. State

0-0

0-0

105.6

66

40

Texas A&M

0-0

0-0

103.4

62

41

Baylor

0-0

0-0

90.9

58

33

 

Conference USA

East Division

 

 

 

 

 

Team

Conf.

Overall

Rating

Off

Def

East Carolina

0-0

0-0

103.8

65

39

Central Florida

0-0

0-0

97.6

58

40

Marshall

0-0

0-0

92.7

56

37

Memphis

0-0

0-0

87.3

58

29

Southern Miss.

0-0

0-0

86.8

57

30

U A B

0-0

0-0

82.7

49

34

West Division

 

 

 

 

 

Team

Conf.

Overall

Rating

Off

Def

Tulsa

0-0

0-0

99.4

66

33

Houston

0-0

0-0

92.1

56

36

Rice

0-0

0-0

87.1

59

28

Tulane

0-0

0-0

84.4

56

28

U T E P

0-0

0-0

82.9

50

33

S M U

0-0

0-0

82.5

57

26

 

Independents

 

 

 

 

 

 

Team

 

Overall

Rating

Off

Def

Notre Dame

 

0-0

102.4

64

38

Navy

 

0-0

92.7

58

35

Army

 

0-0

77.2

49

28

 

Mid American Conference

East Division

 

 

 

 

 

Team

Conf.

Overall

Rating

Off

Def

Temple

0-0

0-0

96.8

59

38

Bowling Green

0-0

0-0

96.3

63

33

Miami (O)

0-0

0-0

93.9

59

35

Buffalo

0-0

0-0

93.0

60

33

Kent State

0-0

0-0

89.0

56

33

Ohio U

0-0

0-0

85.5

53

33

Akron

0-0

0-0

83.9

57

27

 

 

 

 

 

 

West Division

 

 

 

 

 

Team

Conf.

Overall

Rating

Off

Def

Ball State

0-0

0-0

102.5

67

36

Central Michigan

0-0

0-0

99.0

66

33

Western Michigan

0-0

0-0

97.5

61

37

Northern Illinois

0-0

0-0

91.7

58

34

Toledo

0-0

0-0

89.8

57

33

Eastern Michigan

0-0

0-0

87.1

54

33

 

Mountain West Conference

 

 

 

 

 

 

Team

Conf.

Overall

Rating

Off

Def

B Y U

0-0

0-0

109.9

70

40

Utah

0-0

0-0

107.5

65

43

T C U

0-0

0-0

106.0

63

43

Wyoming

0-0

0-0

93.8

59

35

New Mexico

0-0

0-0

93.3

58

35

U N L V

0-0

0-0

89.3

58

31

Air Force

0-0

0-0

89.0

54

35

Colorado State

0-0

0-0

86.3

55

31

San Diego State

0-0

0-0

86.2

52

34

 

Pac-10 Conference

 

 

 

 

 

 

Team

Conf.

Overall

Rating

Off

Def

Oregon

0-0

0-0

117.7

70

48

Southern Cal

0-0

0-0

117.4

67

50

Arizona State

0-0

0-0

114.7

71

44

California

0-0

0-0

109.2

65

44

Arizona

0-0

0-0

106.7

69

38

Oregon State

0-0

0-0

106.2

68

38

U C L A

0-0

0-0

105.0

62

43

Washington

0-0

0-0

104.9

67

38

Stanford

0-0

0-0

102.7

62

41

Washington State

0-0

0-0

99.2

61

38

 

Southeastern Conference

East Division

 

 

 

 

 

Team

Conf.

Overall

Rating

Off

Def

Florida 

0-0

0-0

126.9

79

48

Georgia 

0-0

0-0

124.0

74

56

South Carolina

0-0

0-0

115.7

70

46

Tennessee

0-0

0-0

114.7

73

42

Kentucky

0-0

0-0

109.1

66

49

Vanderbilt

0-0

0-0

99.5

60

40

West Division

 

 

 

 

 

Team

Conf.

Overall

Rating

Off

Def

Auburn

0-0

0-0

120.3

74

46

L S U

0-0

0-0

117.3

72

45

Alabama

0-0

0-0

109.5

66

44

Ole Miss

0-0

0-0

108.3

65

43

Mississippi State

0-0

0-0

108.0

62

46

Arkansas

0-0

0-0

102.7

68

35

 

Sunbelt Conference

 

 

 

 

 

 

Team

Conf.

Overall

Rating

Off

Def

Florida Atlantic

0-0

0-0

99.0

66

33

Troy

0-0

0-0

97.4

61

36

Louisiana Monroe

0-0

0-0

89.8

56

34

*Western Kentucky 

0-0

0-0

85.5

54

32

Arkansas State

0-0

0-0

84.8

56

29

Louisiana Lafayette

0-0

0-0

84.2

56

28

Middle Tennessee

0-0

0-0

84.0

55

29

Florida International

0-0

0-0

79.4

50

29

North Texas

0-0

0-0

74.0

52

22

 

 

 

 

 

 

* Western Kentucky will become eligible in 2009

 

 

 

Their games will not count in the SBC Standings in 2008

 

 

 

Western Athletic Conference

 

 

 

 

 

 

Team

Conf.

Overall

Rating

Off

Def

Fresno State

0-0

0-0

106.8

69

38

Boise State

0-0

0-0

103.4

65

38

Hawaii

0-0

0-0

92.8

57

36

Nevada

0-0

0-0

92.8

62

31

Louisiana Tech

0-0

0-0

88.9

56

33

San Jose State

0-0

0-0

87.5

55

33

Utah State

0-0

0-0

82.7

49

34

New Mexico State

0-0

0-0

82.3

51

31

Idaho

0-0

0-0

81.7

58

24

 

This Week’s Games

Home Team in Bold

(N) Denotes Neutral Site

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thursday, August 28

 

 

 

Favorite

Underdog

Pred. Spread

Approx. Score

Buffalo

U T E P

13

30-17

Vanderbilt

Miami-OH

3

24-21

Troy

Middle Tennessee

10

31-21

Wake Forest

Baylor

14

28-14

South Carolina

North Carolina St.

25

38-13

Oregon State

Stanford

1

27-26

 

 

 

 

Friday, August 29

 

 

 

Favorite

Underdog

Pred. Spread

Approx. Score

Temple

Army

17

31-14

Rice

SMU

7

35-28

 

 

 

 

Saturday, August 30

 

 

 

Favorite

Underdog

Pred. Spread

Approx. Score

Northwestern

Syracuse

10

31-21

Indiana

Western Kentucky

14

34-20

Virginia Tech

East Carolina

5

28-23

Pittsburgh

Bowling Green

14

31-17

Wisconsin

Akron

32

45-13

Florida

Hawaii

39

45-6

Texas

Florida Atlantic

15

41-26

Wyoming

Ohio U

12

28-16

Michigan

Utah

Pk

23-23 to OT

Southern Cal

Virginia

15

28-13

Oklahoma State

Washington State

4

28-24

Tulsa

U A B

13

30-17

T C U

New Mexico

10

27-17

Mississippi State

Louisiana Tech

16

26-10

Auburn

Louisiana Monroe

34

44-10

Minnesota

Northern Illinois

5

31-26

Ole Miss

Memphis

23

37-14

Nebraska

Western Michigan

6

27-21

Texas A&M

Arkansas State

22

35-13

Kansas

Florida International

42

42-0

Southern Miss.

Louisiana-Lafayette

6

30-24

Kansas State

North Texas

31

48-17

Boston College

Kent State

10

27-17

California

Michigan State

6

27-21

Clemson  (n-Atlanta)

Alabama

9

29-20

Missouri   (n-St. Louis)

Illinois

16

33-17

Arizona

Idaho

28

45-17

U N L V

Utah State

9

27-18

Oregon

Washington 

16

33-17

 

 

 

 

Sunday, August 31

 

 

 

Favorite

Underdog

Pred. Spread

Approx. Score

Kentucky

Louisville

14

31-17

Colorado  (n-Denver)

Colorado State

18

34-16

 

 

 

 

Monday, September 1

 

 

 

Favorite

Underdog

Pred. Spread

Approx. Score

Rutgers

Fresno State

4

31-27

Tennessee

U C L A

6

30-24

 

Mean Rating Predictions

The Mean Rating is my old rating from the 1970’s and 1980’s.  I brought it back last year as a supplement.  When the PiRate spread and the Mean Rating agree on the point spread choice from the Las Vegas Line and both ratings differ by more than 2½ points from the Vegas Line, then consider that game as a playable game against the spread.  

 

When the two ratings agree on the predicted winner of the game, and the Vegas Line is 1-10 points on that team as the favorite, then consider that game as playable on the Money Line.  These strategies work best against the Monday lines for Saturday games.

 

This Week’s Games–Mean Ratings

Home Team in Bold

(N) Denotes Neutral Site

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thursday, August 28

 

 

 

Favorite

Underdog

Mean Prediction

Buffalo

U T E P

28-24

Vanderbilt

Miami-OH

21-16

Troy

Middle Tennessee

30-23

Wake Forest

Baylor

27-10

South Carolina

North Carolina St.

31-16

Oregon State

Stanford

31-20

 

 

 

 

Friday, August 29

 

 

 

Favorite

Underdog

Mean Prediction

Temple

Army

24-23

Rice

SMU

37-31

 

 

 

 

Saturday, August 30

 

 

 

Favorite

Underdog

Mean Prediction

Northwestern

Syracuse

31-20

Indiana

Western Kentucky

35-20

Virginia Tech

East Carolina

28-12

Pittsburgh

Bowling Green

31-17

Wisconsin

Akron

44-17

Florida

Hawaii

41-21

Texas

Florida Atlantic

42-21

Wyoming

Ohio U

24-17

Michigan

Utah

24-20

Southern Cal

Virginia

27-12

Oklahoma State

Washington State

27-24

Tulsa

U A B

34-17

T C U

New Mexico

20-17

Mississippi State

Louisiana Tech

24-12

Auburn

Louisiana Monroe

34-10

Minnesota

Northern Illinois

28-17

Ole Miss

Memphis

31-21

Nebraska

Western Michigan

28-16

Texas A&M

Arkansas State

35-14

Kansas

Florida International

42-0

Southern Miss.

Louisiana-Lafayette

33-17

Kansas State

North Texas

45-20

Boston College

Kent State

28-6

California

Michigan State

26-21

Clemson (n-Atlanta)

Alabama

27-20

Missouri   (n-St. Louis)

Illinois

28-16

Arizona

Idaho

45-17

U N L V

Utah State

27-20

Oregon

Washington 

35-19

 

 

 

 

Sunday, August 31

 

 

 

Favorite

Underdog

Mean Prediction

Louisville

Kentucky

28-27

Colorado  (n-Denver)

Colorado State

30-20

 

 

 

 

Monday, September 1

 

 

 

Favorite

Underdog

Mean Prediction

Rutgers

Fresno State

31-23

Tennessee

U C L A

28-27

 

Preview For Wisconsin-Akron

 

Vegas:       Wisconsin by 26½

PiRate:      Wisconsin by 32

Mean:        Wisconsin by 27

Strategy:   Neither Sides nor Moneyline apply to this game

 

The 2008 season finds Coach Bret Bielema’s Badgers loaded.  If it weren’t for the unbelievable mix of talent in Columbus, Ohio, I would tend to pick UW to win the Big Ten title.  The defense should be a little better than last season, while the offense may take a few games to gel.  However, once quarterback Allan Evridge shakes off the rust, he could actually be more explosive than departed star Tyler Donovan.

 

In game one, I am inclined to believe that the Badgers will start a little sluggish.  Akron is much weaker than they were during the Charlie Frye days, and the Zips are no threat to win this game.  It will allow UW to work out the kinks and get a win under their belt without worrying about an Appalachian State moment.

 

My personal prediction here is a 35-17 win for the Badgers.  Yes, I do disagree with my own ratings from time to time.

 

Preview for Vanderbilt-Miami of Ohio

 

Vegas:       Miami by 4

PiRate:      Vanderbilt by 3

Mean:        Vanderbilt by 5

Strategy:   Vanderbilt +3 and Vanderbilt +175 on the moneyline

 

This is a scary proposition.  I’ve witnessed Vanderbilt football games for more than four decades, and the Commodores have broken the hearts of their fans more than once (more like more than one hundred times) in that time span. 

 

Miami has a couple of famous traditions.  First, the school is known as the “Cradle of Coaches.”  I doubt there is another program that can equal the great group of leaders that came from Oxford, Ohio.  Here’s a sampling off the top of my head: Paul Brown, Woody Hayes, Bo Schembechler, Weeb Eewbank, Ara Parseghian, Bill Mallory, Dick Crum, Randy Walker, and Terry Hoeppner.

 

It’s the other tradition that worries me.  Miami has been known to upset their share of opponents.  They once beat Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina in bowl games in three consecutive seasons.  They have won at Kentucky and at LSU.  When Northwestern won the Big 10 Championship and went to the Rose Bowl in the mid-90’s, their lone regular season loss was to Miami.

 

Now, take into consideration that this will be the first time an SEC opponent plays at Yager Stadium.  Also take into consideration that Vanderbilt is the number 12 team in the SEC and will be playing this game with an entirely new starting offensive line and with five new players in the defensive front seven.  They will be playing without their most potent weapon from last year in wideout Earl Bennett, and their best returning receiver, George Smith, will miss this game due to injury.  They lost their top running back from last year, and their starting back has never fully recovered from an ACL injury in 2006.

 

Vanderbilt steamrollered over Miami last year.  They simply ran the ball between the tackles, ala Ohio State in the Woody Hayes days.  Miami didn’t have the strength to stop the running attack even though they knew the Commodores were not going to throw the ball with an injured quarterback unable to pass.

 

Logic holds that Vandy can line up and play smash-mouth football and win this game in ugly fashion.  A few well-timed long play-action passes can be more valuable than throwing it 35 times in this game.

 

I think the Commodores will come from behind in the second half and win this game by wearing down the Redhawks in the trenches.  Here’s a little secret: Vanderbilt has possibly the best offensive line coach in college football.  Robbie Caldwell will have molded the new line players into a cohesive unit by the time this game begins, and the Commodores should find success running the ball, while quarterback Chris Nickson should have enough time to locate receivers to keep the defense honest.  This isn’t going to be a team that threatens to break the long streak of losing seasons, but this team should still be competitive.

 

My personal prediction is the same as the PiRate prediction.  Even should Miami pull off the win, four points are a lot to cover.  I like playing underdogs of more than a field goal when they have a good chance of winning outright, even when it’s the school with a tradition of breaking hearts.  Go with Vanderbilt at +4 and at +175 in the Money Line.

 

Other Playable Games According to the PiRates

 

Oregon State -155 vs. Stanford

Troy -260 vs. Middle Tennessee

Temple -270 vs. Army

Rice -3½ and -165 vs. SMU

Ole Miss -7½ and -310 vs. Memphis

Oregon -13½ vs. Washington

TCU -260 vs. New Mexico

Mississippi State -7½ and -350 vs. Louisiana Tech 

Washington State +7 vs. Oklahoma State

Missouri -8½ and -370 vs. Illinois

California -185 vs. Michigan State

Virginia +20 vs. Southern California

Utah State +9½ vs. UNLV and UNLV -500 vs. Utah State

Western Kentucky +20½ vs. Indiana (WKU’s first line ever!)

Florida Atlantic +24 vs. Texas

Kansas -36 vs. Florida International

Kentucky +3½ vs. Louisville

Rutgers -230 vs. Fresno State

Tennessee -290 vs. UCLA   

Blog at WordPress.com.