The Pi-Rate Ratings

December 27, 2021

PiRate Ratings–College Basketball 2021-22 Debut

Welcome bask to the PiRate Ratings College Basketball coverage for 2021-22. We are excited about a few new changes and the resumption of some old methods here this year. Today, we start our coverage with two posts. This one will include our initial ratings for the season of the 358 Division 1 teams. The post coming later today will include our opening Bracketology for the season.

Every week until Conference Tournament Championships commence, we plan on releasing updated ratings on Monday and Friday mornings (hopefully before Noon Eastern Time). We will issue updated Bracketology on Monday afternoons through Mid-February, at which time the updates will increase to two per week until March. Once the conference tournaments commence and surprise winners and losers emerge, we will begin to update the Bubble daily.

During the week, we will issue spreads of games between Power Conference teams. Because our method for coming up with game spreads is somewhat labor intensive and not 100% mechanical, it takes too long to calculate spreads on every game. Our method involves a game-specific home court advantage for each game, because when teams play more than once a week and fatigue must be adjusted for the road team in every game. Toss in the Covid issue, and home court advantage can move to 8-10 points. If the home team is in trouble, the visiting team might actually get points!

Also from time to time, we will issue commentary or analysis of the game. Our annual publication of top Low-Major and Mid-Major head coaches and top assistant coaches ready for the big time has been one of our most read annual publications, and because so many of the guys on our list are now coaching at big time schools, we expect this year’s edition will be expanded some. Expect that post in Mid-January.

By far our most read posts every year are our “Bracketnomic” reports for March Madness. We use technical data that has been back-tested for more than two decades, with some data back-tested to 1939, to attempt to isolate the true contenders for the National Championship. Baylor and Gonzaga were both on that list last year. Our own creation, The R+T Rating, has helped us locate favorites ripe for early NCAA Tournament upsets, and it has helped us locate sleeper teams that could surprise. In the past, we saw George Mason as a sleeper when they sneaked into the Final Four. We saw the same with Wichita State, Virginia Commonwealth, and Butler. But, there was a year where we not only picked 15-seed Florida Gulf Coast to upset 2-seed Georgetown, we said it could be by double digits. When FGCU ran the Hoyas into the ground that night, our ratings briefly received a national accolade, and many of you reading this today became subscribers to this site.

Without further adieu, here are our opening ratings for 2021-22. Thank you for stopping by. We hope you stick around for the season.

PiRate Ratings

#TeamPiRateConference
1Gonzaga122.6West Coast
2Baylor121.1Big 12
3Arizona120.7Pac-12
4Purdue120.3Big Ten
5Houston120.0American Athletic
6Kansas119.5Big 12
7Duke118.6Atlantic Coast
8LSU118.1Southeastern
9Tennessee117.9Southeastern
10UCLA117.5Pac-12
11Auburn117.4Southeastern
12Kentucky117.3Southeastern
13Illinois116.9Big Ten
14Alabama116.1Southeastern
15Villanova115.9Big East
16Ohio St.115.7Big Ten
17Michigan St.115.4Big Ten
18Michigan115.3Big Ten
19USC114.9Pac-12
20Texas Tech114.9Big 12
21Iowa114.8Big Ten
22Connecticut114.6Big East
23Texas114.5Big 12
24Xavier114.5Big East
25Seton Hall114.4Big East
26Virginia Tech113.8Atlantic Coast
27Florida113.6Southeastern
28Indiana113.3Big Ten
29Memphis113.3American Athletic
30Loyola Chicago113.1Missouri Valley
31BYU112.6West Coast
32Oklahoma112.3Big 12
33North Carolina112.0Atlantic Coast
34Colorado St.111.6Mountain West
35Florida St.111.6Atlantic Coast
36Wisconsin111.3Big Ten
37West Virginia111.3Big 12
38Arkansas111.2Southeastern
39San Francisco111.2West Coast
40Mississippi St.110.8Southeastern
41Clemson110.8Atlantic Coast
42Saint Mary’s110.8West Coast
43Northwestern110.8Big Ten
44Oklahoma St.110.7Big 12
45UAB110.5Conference USA
46San Diego St.110.0Mountain West
47Washington St.109.9Pac-12
48Louisville109.8Atlantic Coast
49Providence109.7Big East
50Iowa St.109.6Big 12
51Utah St.109.5Mountain West
52Maryland109.3Big Ten
53Boise St.109.1Mountain West
54UCF109.1American Athletic
55Belmont109.0Ohio Valley
56Oregon108.9Pac-12
57Creighton108.9Big East
58Davidson108.6Atlantic 10
59TCU108.5Big 12
60Richmond108.4Atlantic 10
61SMU108.4American Athletic
62Wichita St.108.4American Athletic
63Wake Forest108.2Atlantic Coast
64St. Bonaventure108.0Atlantic 10
65Murray St.107.9Ohio Valley
66Texas A&M107.8Southeastern
67Notre Dame107.8Atlantic Coast
68Minnesota107.7Big Ten
69Cincinnati107.7American Athletic
70Saint Louis107.6Atlantic 10
71St. John’s107.5Big East
72Utah107.5Pac-12
73DePaul107.4Big East
74Marquette107.4Big East
75Virginia107.3Atlantic Coast
76VCU107.3Atlantic 10
77Kansas St.107.2Big 12
78Syracuse107.2Atlantic Coast
79Rhode Island107.1Atlantic 10
80Buffalo107.1Mid-American
81South Dakota St.107.0Summit
82Penn St.107.0Big Ten
83Missouri St.107.0Missouri Valley
84Fresno St.106.9Mountain West
85Vanderbilt106.8Southeastern
86Wyoming106.7Mountain West
87Nevada106.7Mountain West
88Drake106.6Missouri Valley
89Iona106.6Metro Atlantic
90Colorado106.4Pac-12
91Santa Clara106.3West Coast
92Louisiana Tech105.8Conference USA
93Stanford105.7Pac-12
94Chattanooga105.7Southern
95Arizona St.105.7Pac-12
96Toledo105.7Mid-American
97South Carolina105.6Southeastern
98North Texas105.6Conference USA
99Ohio105.4Mid-American
100UC Irvine105.4Big West
101Vermont105.4America East
102Dayton105.3Atlantic 10
103Wofford105.2Southern
104Rutgers105.1Big Ten
105Miami FL105.0Atlantic Coast
106Mississippi104.8Southeastern
107Towson104.8Colonial Athletic
108New Mexico St.104.8Western Athletic
109Monmouth104.7Metro Atlantic
110N.C. State104.5Atlantic Coast
111Western Kentucky104.5Conference USA
112Georgia Tech104.4Atlantic Coast
113Wagner104.4Northeast
114Butler104.4Big East
115California104.3Pac-12
116Hofstra104.2Colonial Athletic
117Furman104.0Southern
118Abilene Christian103.9Western Athletic
119Grand Canyon103.7Western Athletic
120Northern Iowa103.7Missouri Valley
121Oakland103.5Horizon
122Georgetown103.5Big East
123Loyola Marymount103.2West Coast
124George Mason103.1Atlantic 10
125Utah Valley103.1Western Athletic
126UNLV102.9Mountain West
127Liberty102.7Atlantic Sun
128Boston College102.6Atlantic Coast
129Colgate102.6Patriot League
130Akron102.6Mid-American
131Southern Utah102.5Big Sky
132Princeton102.5Ivy League
133Navy102.4Patriot League
134Massachusetts102.2Atlantic 10
135Jacksonville St.102.2Atlantic Sun
136Southern Illinois102.1Missouri Valley
137UC Santa Barbara102.1Big West
138UC Riverside102.0Big West
139Nebraska101.9Big Ten
140Tulsa101.8American Athletic
141Oral Roberts101.6Summit
142James Madison101.5Colonial Athletic
143Weber St.101.5Big Sky
144Texas St.101.5Sun Belt
145Northeastern101.5Colonial Athletic
146Morehead St.101.5Ohio Valley
147Bradley101.4Missouri Valley
148Yale101.3Ivy League
149Miami OH101.3Mid-American
150Oregon St.101.2Pac-12
151Georgia St.101.2Sun Belt
152South Alabama101.1Sun Belt
153Cleveland St.101.1Horizon
154Marshall101.1Conference USA
155Kent St.101.0Mid-American
156Temple101.0American Athletic
157East Tennessee St.100.8Southern
158Boston University100.6Patriot League
159Stephen F. Austin100.6Western Athletic
160Bowling Green100.6Mid-American
161Delaware100.3Colonial Athletic
162Rice100.3Conference USA
163Washington100.3Pac-12
164Brown100.1Ivy League
165Missouri100.1Southeastern
166Eastern Kentucky100.1Atlantic Sun
167Tulane99.9American Athletic
168Pittsburgh99.9Atlantic Coast
169Appalachian St.99.9Sun Belt
170Coastal Carolina99.8Sun Belt
171Fairfield99.8Metro Atlantic
172Drexel99.6Colonial Athletic
173Harvard99.6Ivy League
174Florida Gulf Coast99.5Atlantic Sun
175Saint Joseph’s99.5Atlantic 10
176Texas Southern99.5Southwestern Athletic
177Georgia99.4Southeastern
178Montana St.99.4Big Sky
179Wright St.99.4Horizon
180North Dakota St.99.4Summit
181Charleston99.3Colonial Athletic
182Winthrop99.3Big South
183Seattle99.3Western Athletic
184UNC Greensboro99.2Southern
185UTEP99.2Conference USA
186East Carolina99.1American Athletic
187Longwood99.1Big South
188Old Dominion99.1Conference USA
189Tarleton St.99.1Western Athletic
190San Diego99.1West Coast
191Louisiana99.0Sun Belt
192Western Illinois98.9Summit
193Valparaiso98.9Missouri Valley
194Charlotte98.9Conference USA
195Duquesne98.8Atlantic 10
196Montana98.8Big Sky
197Indiana St.98.8Missouri Valley
198Campbell98.7Big South
199Middle Tennessee98.6Conference USA
200Niagara98.6Metro Atlantic
201New Hampshire98.5America East
202Cal St. Fullerton98.4Big West
203Northern Colorado98.3Big Sky
204Florida Atlantic98.2Conference USA
205Georgia Southern98.1Sun Belt
206Stony Brook98.1America East
207Cornell98.1Ivy League
208UC Davis98.0Big West
209Marist98.0Metro Atlantic
210Cal Baptist97.9Western Athletic
211UMass Lowell97.9America East
212Fordham97.8Atlantic 10
213Eastern Washington97.7Big Sky
214Detroit Mercy97.7Horizon
215UMKC97.6Summit
216Nicholls St.97.6Southland
217Mercer97.6Southern
218Northern Kentucky97.5Horizon
219Saint Peter’s97.5Metro Atlantic
220Jacksonville97.5Atlantic Sun
221Penn97.5Ivy League
222Louisiana Monroe97.5Sun Belt
223New Mexico97.5Mountain West
224Bellarmine97.5Atlantic Sun
225FIU97.4Conference USA
226Gardner Webb97.3Big South
227VMI97.2Southern
228Illinois St.97.1Missouri Valley
229Arkansas St.97.1Sun Belt
230Howard97.0Mideastern Athletic
231Sam Houston St.96.9Western Athletic
232Hawaii96.8Big West
233Bryant96.8Northeast
234Cal St. Bakersfield96.6Big West
235UMBC96.5America East
236Youngstown St.96.5Horizon
237South Florida96.5American Athletic
238Pepperdine96.4West Coast
239UNC Asheville96.2Big South
240Jackson St.96.1Southwestern Athletic
241Quinnipiac95.8Metro Atlantic
242Dartmouth95.8Ivy League
243UT Arlington95.8Sun Belt
244Pacific95.7West Coast
245Troy95.5Sun Belt
246South Dakota95.5Summit
247Samford95.4Southern
248La Salle95.4Atlantic 10
249Evansville95.3Missouri Valley
250UC San Diego95.3Big West
251The Citadel95.2Southern
252Portland St.95.1Big Sky
253Manhattan95.1Metro Atlantic
254St. Francis PA95.0Northeast
255Illinois Chicago95.0Horizon
256Norfolk St.94.9Mideastern Athletic
257Stetson94.9Atlantic Sun
258LIU94.9Northeast
259George Washington94.8Atlantic 10
260Southern94.8Southwestern Athletic
261Tennessee Tech94.4Ohio Valley
262Radford94.4Big South
263Milwaukee94.3Horizon
264Ball St.94.3Mid-American
265Merrimack94.2Northeast
266Portland94.2West Coast
267North Alabama94.1Atlantic Sun
268Purdue Fort Wayne94.0Horizon
269Kennesaw St.94.0Atlantic Sun
270Loyola MD93.9Patriot League
271Prairie View A&M93.8Southwestern Athletic
272High Point93.7Big South
273Lipscomb93.5Atlantic Sun
274Eastern Michigan93.5Mid-American
275Army93.4Patriot League
276NJIT93.4America East
277North Carolina A&T93.4Big South
278Long Beach St.93.4Big West
279San Jose St.93.3Mountain West
280Canisius93.3Metro Atlantic
281Austin Peay93.3Ohio Valley
282Presbyterian93.3Big South
283Texas A&M Corpus Chris93.2Southland
284Elon93.2Colonial Athletic
285Sacred Heart93.2Northeast
286North Florida93.1Atlantic Sun
287Hartford93.1America East
288UNC Wilmington93.0Colonial Athletic
289Albany93.0America East
290UT Rio Grande Valley92.9Western Athletic
291St. Thomas92.8Summit
292Siena92.7Metro Atlantic
293Air Force92.7Mountain West
294SIU Edwardsville92.5Ohio Valley
295Western Carolina92.5Southern
296Southern Miss92.4Conference USA
297Rider92.4Metro Atlantic
298Mount St. Mary’s92.4Northeast
299Cal Poly92.1Big West
300New Orleans92.1Southland
301Robert Morris92.0Horizon
302Dixie St.91.9Western Athletic
303Tennessee St.91.8Ohio Valley
304Cal St. Northridge91.8Big West
305Alcorn St.91.6Southwestern Athletic
306Lafayette91.5Patriot League
307Florida A&M91.5Southwestern Athletic
308Binghamton91.4America East
309Coppin St.91.2Mideastern Athletic
310Southeastern Louisiana91.1Southland
311Sacramento St.91.0Big Sky
312UTSA91.0Conference USA
313Bucknell90.9Patriot League
314Idaho St.90.7Big Sky
315Lamar90.7Western Athletic
316Green Bay90.7Horizon
317Little Rock90.7Sun Belt
318Northern Arizona90.6Big Sky
319McNeese St.90.4Southland
320St. Francis NY90.3Northeast
321Southeast Missouri St.90.2Ohio Valley
322North Carolina Central90.2Mideastern Athletic
323Morgan St.90.0Mideastern Athletic
324Northern Illinois89.7Mid-American
325American89.6Patriot League
326Lehigh89.4Patriot League
327Denver89.1Summit
328Maryland Eastern Shore88.9Mideastern Athletic
329USC Upstate88.8Big South
330Tennessee Martin88.6Ohio Valley
331Central Michigan88.6Mid-American
332Grambling St.88.5Southwestern Athletic
333Hampton88.4Big South
334Western Michigan88.3Mid-American
335Idaho88.1Big Sky
336Northwestern St.87.3Southland
337South Carolina St.87.2Mideastern Athletic
338Alabama A&M87.1Southwestern Athletic
339Central Connecticut86.9Northeast
340Nebraska Omaha86.9Summit
341William & Mary86.8Colonial Athletic
342Fairleigh Dickinson86.7Northeast
343Alabama St.86.7Southwestern Athletic
344North Dakota86.6Summit
345Holy Cross86.5Patriot League
346Bethune Cookman86.0Southwestern Athletic
347Columbia85.9Ivy League
348Central Arkansas85.5Atlantic Sun
349Charleston Southern85.2Big South
350Incarnate Word85.1Southland
351Houston Baptist84.7Southland
352Maine84.4America East
353Eastern Illinois84.3Ohio Valley
354Chicago St.82.7Western Athletic
355IUPUI82.6Horizon
356Arkansas Pine Bluff82.3Southwestern Athletic
357Delaware St.78.8Mideastern Athletic
358Mississippi Valley St.74.3Southwestern Athletic

PiRate Ratings Alphabetically

TeamPiRate
Abilene Christian103.9
Air Force92.7
Akron102.6
Alabama116.1
Alabama A&M87.1
Alabama St.86.7
Albany93.0
Alcorn St.91.6
American89.6
Appalachian St.99.9
Arizona120.7
Arizona St.105.7
Arkansas111.2
Arkansas Pine Bluff82.3
Arkansas St.97.1
Army93.4
Auburn117.4
Austin Peay93.3
Ball St.94.3
Baylor121.1
Bellarmine97.5
Belmont109.0
Bethune Cookman86.0
Binghamton91.4
Boise St.109.1
Boston College102.6
Boston University100.6
Bowling Green100.6
Bradley101.4
Brown100.1
Bryant96.8
Bucknell90.9
Buffalo107.1
Butler104.4
BYU112.6
Cal Baptist97.9
Cal Poly92.1
Cal St. Bakersfield96.6
Cal St. Fullerton98.4
Cal St. Northridge91.8
California104.3
Campbell98.7
Canisius93.3
Central Arkansas85.5
Central Connecticut86.9
Central Michigan88.6
Charleston99.3
Charleston Southern85.2
Charlotte98.9
Chattanooga105.7
Chicago St.82.7
Cincinnati107.7
Clemson110.8
Cleveland St.101.1
Coastal Carolina99.8
Colgate102.6
Colorado106.4
Colorado St.111.6
Columbia85.9
Connecticut114.6
Coppin St.91.2
Cornell98.1
Creighton108.9
Dartmouth95.8
Davidson108.6
Dayton105.3
Delaware100.3
Delaware St.78.8
Denver89.1
DePaul107.4
Detroit Mercy97.7
Dixie St.91.9
Drake106.6
Drexel99.6
Duke118.6
Duquesne98.8
East Carolina99.1
East Tennessee St.100.8
Eastern Illinois84.3
Eastern Kentucky100.1
Eastern Michigan93.5
Eastern Washington97.7
Elon93.2
Evansville95.3
Fairfield99.8
Fairleigh Dickinson86.7
FIU97.4
Florida113.6
Florida A&M91.5
Florida Atlantic98.2
Florida Gulf Coast99.5
Florida St.111.6
Fordham97.8
Fresno St.106.9
Furman104.0
Gardner Webb97.3
George Mason103.1
George Washington94.8
Georgetown103.5
Georgia99.4
Georgia Southern98.1
Georgia St.101.2
Georgia Tech104.4
Gonzaga122.6
Grambling St.88.5
Grand Canyon103.7
Green Bay90.7
Hampton88.4
Hartford93.1
Harvard99.6
Hawaii96.8
High Point93.7
Hofstra104.2
Holy Cross86.5
Houston120.0
Houston Baptist84.7
Howard97.0
Idaho88.1
Idaho St.90.7
Illinois116.9
Illinois Chicago95.0
Illinois St.97.1
Incarnate Word85.1
Indiana113.3
Indiana St.98.8
Iona106.6
Iowa114.8
Iowa St.109.6
IUPUI82.6
Jackson St.96.1
Jacksonville97.5
Jacksonville St.102.2
James Madison101.5
Kansas119.5
Kansas St.107.2
Kennesaw St.94.0
Kent St.101.0
Kentucky117.3
La Salle95.4
Lafayette91.5
Lamar90.7
Lehigh89.4
Liberty102.7
Lipscomb93.5
Little Rock90.7
LIU94.9
Long Beach St.93.4
Longwood99.1
Louisiana99.0
Louisiana Monroe97.5
Louisiana Tech105.8
Louisville109.8
Loyola Chicago113.1
Loyola Marymount103.2
Loyola MD93.9
LSU118.1
Maine84.4
Manhattan95.1
Marist98.0
Marquette107.4
Marshall101.1
Maryland109.3
Maryland Eastern Shore88.9
Massachusetts102.2
McNeese St.90.4
Memphis113.3
Mercer97.6
Merrimack94.2
Miami FL105.0
Miami OH101.3
Michigan115.3
Michigan St.115.4
Middle Tennessee98.6
Milwaukee94.3
Minnesota107.7
Mississippi104.8
Mississippi St.110.8
Mississippi Valley St.74.3
Missouri100.1
Missouri St.107.0
Monmouth104.7
Montana98.8
Montana St.99.4
Morehead St.101.5
Morgan St.90.0
Mount St. Mary’s92.4
Murray St.107.9
N.C. State104.5
Navy102.4
Nebraska101.9
Nebraska Omaha86.9
Nevada106.7
New Hampshire98.5
New Mexico97.5
New Mexico St.104.8
New Orleans92.1
Niagara98.6
Nicholls St.97.6
NJIT93.4
Norfolk St.94.9
North Alabama94.1
North Carolina112.0
North Carolina A&T93.4
North Carolina Central90.2
North Dakota86.6
North Dakota St.99.4
North Florida93.1
North Texas105.6
Northeastern101.5
Northern Arizona90.6
Northern Colorado98.3
Northern Illinois89.7
Northern Iowa103.7
Northern Kentucky97.5
Northwestern110.8
Northwestern St.87.3
Notre Dame107.8
Oakland103.5
Ohio105.4
Ohio St.115.7
Oklahoma112.3
Oklahoma St.110.7
Old Dominion99.1
Oral Roberts101.6
Oregon108.9
Oregon St.101.2
Pacific95.7
Penn97.5
Penn St.107.0
Pepperdine96.4
Pittsburgh99.9
Portland94.2
Portland St.95.1
Prairie View A&M93.8
Presbyterian93.3
Princeton102.5
Providence109.7
Purdue120.3
Purdue Fort Wayne94.0
Quinnipiac95.8
Radford94.4
Rhode Island107.1
Rice100.3
Richmond108.4
Rider92.4
Robert Morris92.0
Rutgers105.1
Sacramento St.91.0
Sacred Heart93.2
Saint Joseph’s99.5
Saint Louis107.6
Saint Mary’s110.8
Saint Peter’s97.5
Sam Houston St.96.9
Samford95.4
San Diego99.1
San Diego St.110.0
San Francisco111.2
San Jose St.93.3
Santa Clara106.3
Seattle99.3
Seton Hall114.4
Siena92.7
SIU Edwardsville92.5
SMU108.4
South Alabama101.1
South Carolina105.6
South Carolina St.87.2
South Dakota95.5
South Dakota St.107.0
South Florida96.5
Southeast Missouri St.90.2
Southeastern Louisiana91.1
Southern94.8
Southern Illinois102.1
Southern Miss92.4
Southern Utah102.5
St. Bonaventure108.0
St. Francis NY90.3
St. Francis PA95.0
St. John’s107.5
St. Thomas92.8
Stanford105.7
Stephen F. Austin100.6
Stetson94.9
Stony Brook98.1
Syracuse107.2
Tarleton St.99.1
TCU108.5
Temple101.0
Tennessee117.9
Tennessee Martin88.6
Tennessee St.91.8
Tennessee Tech94.4
Texas114.5
Texas A&M107.8
Texas A&M Corpus Chris93.2
Texas Southern99.5
Texas St.101.5
Texas Tech114.9
The Citadel95.2
Toledo105.7
Towson104.8
Troy95.5
Tulane99.9
Tulsa101.8
UAB110.5
UC Davis98.0
UC Irvine105.4
UC Riverside102.0
UC San Diego95.3
UC Santa Barbara102.1
UCF109.1
UCLA117.5
UMass Lowell97.9
UMBC96.5
UMKC97.6
UNC Asheville96.2
UNC Greensboro99.2
UNC Wilmington93.0
UNLV102.9
USC114.9
USC Upstate88.8
UT Arlington95.8
UT Rio Grande Valley92.9
Utah107.5
Utah St.109.5
Utah Valley103.1
UTEP99.2
UTSA91.0
Valparaiso98.9
Vanderbilt106.8
VCU107.3
Vermont105.4
Villanova115.9
Virginia107.3
Virginia Tech113.8
VMI97.2
Wagner104.4
Wake Forest108.2
Washington100.3
Washington St.109.9
Weber St.101.5
West Virginia111.3
Western Carolina92.5
Western Illinois98.9
Western Kentucky104.5
Western Michigan88.3
Wichita St.108.4
William & Mary86.8
Winthrop99.3
Wisconsin111.3
Wofford105.2
Wright St.99.4
Wyoming106.7
Xavier114.5
Yale101.3
Youngstown St.96.5

PiRate Ratings By Conference

America East
TeamRating
Vermont105.4
New Hampshire98.5
Stony Brook98.1
UMass Lowell97.9
UMBC96.5
NJIT93.4
Hartford93.1
Albany93.0
Binghamton91.4
Maine84.4

American Athletic
TeamRating
Houston120.0
Memphis113.3
UCF109.1
SMU108.4
Wichita St.108.4
Cincinnati107.7
Tulsa101.8
Temple101.0
Tulane99.9
East Carolina99.1
South Florida96.5

Atlantic 10
TeamRating
Davidson108.6
Richmond108.4
St. Bonaventure108.0
Saint Louis107.6
VCU107.3
Rhode Island107.1
Dayton105.3
George Mason103.1
Massachusetts102.2
Saint Joseph’s99.5
Duquesne98.8
Fordham97.8
La Salle95.4
George Washington94.8

Atlantic Coast
TeamRating
Duke118.6
Virginia Tech113.8
North Carolina112.0
Florida St.111.6
Clemson110.8
Louisville109.8
Wake Forest108.2
Notre Dame107.8
Virginia107.3
Syracuse107.2
Miami FL105.0
N.C. State104.5
Georgia Tech104.4
Boston College102.6
Pittsburgh99.9

Atlantic Sun
TeamRating
Liberty102.7
Jacksonville St.102.2
Eastern Kentucky100.1
Florida Gulf Coast99.5
Jacksonville97.5
Bellarmine97.5
Stetson94.9
North Alabama94.1
Kennesaw St.94.0
Lipscomb93.5
North Florida93.1
Central Arkansas85.5

Big 12
TeamRating
Baylor121.1
Kansas119.5
Texas Tech114.9
Texas114.5
Oklahoma112.3
West Virginia111.3
Oklahoma St.110.7
Iowa St.109.6
TCU108.5
Kansas St.107.2

Big East
TeamRating
Villanova115.9
Connecticut114.6
Xavier114.5
Seton Hall114.4
Providence109.7
Creighton108.9
St. John’s107.5
DePaul107.4
Marquette107.4
Butler104.4
Georgetown103.5

Big Sky
TeamRating
Southern Utah102.5
Weber St.101.5
Montana St.99.4
Montana98.8
Northern Colorado98.3
Eastern Washington97.7
Portland St.95.1
Sacramento St.91.0
Idaho St.90.7
Northern Arizona90.6
Idaho88.1

Big South
TeamRating
Winthrop99.3
Longwood99.1
Campbell98.7
Gardner Webb97.3
UNC Asheville96.2
Radford94.4
High Point93.7
North Carolina A&T93.4
Presbyterian93.3
USC Upstate88.8
Hampton88.4
Charleston Southern85.2

Big Ten
TeamRating
Purdue120.3
Illinois116.9
Ohio St.115.7
Michigan St.115.4
Michigan115.3
Iowa114.8
Indiana113.3
Wisconsin111.3
Northwestern110.8
Maryland109.3
Minnesota107.7
Penn St.107.0
Rutgers105.1
Nebraska101.9

Big West
TeamRating
UC Irvine105.4
UC Santa Barbara102.1
UC Riverside102.0
Cal St. Fullerton98.4
UC Davis98.0
Hawaii96.8
Cal St. Bakersfield96.6
UC San Diego95.3
Long Beach St.93.4
Cal Poly92.1
Cal St. Northridge91.8

Colonial Athletic
TeamRating
Towson104.8
Hofstra104.2
James Madison101.5
Northeastern101.5
Delaware100.3
Drexel99.6
Charleston99.3
Elon93.2
UNC Wilmington93.0
William & Mary86.8

Conference USA
TeamRating
UAB110.5
Louisiana Tech105.8
North Texas105.6
Western Kentucky104.5
Marshall101.1
Rice100.3
UTEP99.2
Old Dominion99.1
Charlotte98.9
Middle Tennessee98.6
Florida Atlantic98.2
FIU97.4
Southern Miss92.4
UTSA91.0

Horizon
TeamRating
Oakland103.5
Cleveland St.101.1
Wright St.99.4
Detroit Mercy97.7
Northern Kentucky97.5
Youngstown St.96.5
Illinois Chicago95.0
Milwaukee94.3
Purdue Fort Wayne94.0
Robert Morris92.0
Green Bay90.7
IUPUI82.6

Ivy League
TeamRating
Princeton102.5
Yale101.3
Brown100.1
Harvard99.6
Cornell98.1
Penn97.5
Dartmouth95.8
Columbia85.9

Metro Atlantic
TeamRating
Iona106.6
Monmouth104.7
Fairfield99.8
Niagara98.6
Marist98.0
Saint Peter’s97.5
Quinnipiac95.8
Manhattan95.1
Canisius93.3
Siena92.7
Rider92.4


Mid-American
TeamRating
Buffalo107.1
Toledo105.7
Ohio105.4
Akron102.6
Miami OH101.3
Kent St.101.0
Bowling Green100.6
Ball St.94.3
Eastern Michigan93.5
Northern Illinois89.7
Central Michigan88.6
Western Michigan88.3

Mideastern Athletic
TeamRating
Howard97.0
Norfolk St.94.9
Coppin St.91.2
North Carolina Central90.2
Morgan St.90.0
Maryland Eastern Shore88.9
South Carolina St.87.2
Delaware St.78.8

Missouri Valley
TeamRating
Loyola Chicago113.1
Missouri St.107.0
Drake106.6
Northern Iowa103.7
Southern Illinois102.1
Bradley101.4
Valparaiso98.9
Indiana St.98.8
Illinois St.97.1
Evansville95.3

Mountain West
TeamRating
Colorado St.111.6
San Diego St.110.0
Utah St.109.5
Boise St.109.1
Fresno St.106.9
Wyoming106.7
Nevada106.7
UNLV102.9
New Mexico97.5
San Jose St.93.3
Air Force92.7

Northeast
TeamRating
Wagner104.4
Bryant96.8
St. Francis PA95.0
LIU94.9
Merrimack94.2
Sacred Heart93.2
Mount St. Mary’s92.4
St. Francis NY90.3
Central Connecticut86.9
Fairleigh Dickinson86.7

Ohio Valley
TeamRating
Belmont109.0
Murray St.107.9
Morehead St.101.5
Tennessee Tech94.4
Austin Peay93.3
SIU Edwardsville92.5
Tennessee St.91.8
Southeast Missouri St.90.2
Tennessee Martin88.6
Eastern Illinois84.3

Pac-12
TeamRating
Arizona120.7
UCLA117.5
USC114.9
Washington St.109.9
Oregon108.9
Utah107.5
Colorado106.4
Stanford105.7
Arizona St.105.7
California104.3
Oregon St.101.2
Washington100.3

Patriot League
TeamRating
Colgate102.6
Navy102.4
Boston University100.6
Loyola MD93.9
Army93.4
Lafayette91.5
Bucknell90.9
American89.6
Lehigh89.4
Holy Cross86.5

Southeastern
TeamRating
LSU118.1
Tennessee117.9
Auburn117.4
Kentucky117.3
Alabama116.1
Florida113.6
Arkansas111.2
Mississippi St.110.8
Texas A&M107.8
Vanderbilt106.8
South Carolina105.6
Mississippi104.8
Missouri100.1
Georgia99.4

Southern
TeamRating
Chattanooga105.7
Wofford105.2
Furman104.0
East Tennessee St.100.8
UNC Greensboro99.2
Mercer97.6
VMI97.2
Samford95.4
The Citadel95.2
Western Carolina92.5

Southland
TeamRating
Nicholls St.97.6
Texas A&M Corpus Chris93.2
New Orleans92.1
Southeastern Louisiana91.1
McNeese St.90.4
Northwestern St.87.3
Incarnate Word85.1
Houston Baptist84.7

Southwestern Athletic
TeamRating
Texas Southern99.5
Jackson St.96.1
Southern94.8
Prairie View A&M93.8
Alcorn St.91.6
Florida A&M91.5
Grambling St.88.5
Alabama A&M87.1
Alabama St.86.7
Bethune Cookman86.0
Arkansas Pine Bluff82.3
Mississippi Valley St.74.3

Summit
TeamRating
South Dakota St.107.0
Oral Roberts101.6
North Dakota St.99.4
Western Illinois98.9
UMKC97.6
South Dakota95.5
St. Thomas92.8
Denver89.1
Nebraska Omaha86.9
North Dakota86.6

Sun Belt
TeamRating
Texas St.101.5
Georgia St.101.2
South Alabama101.1
Appalachian St.99.9
Coastal Carolina99.8
Louisiana99.0
Georgia Southern98.1
Louisiana Monroe97.5
Arkansas St.97.1
UT Arlington95.8
Troy95.5
Little Rock90.7

West Coast
TeamRating
Gonzaga122.6
BYU112.6
San Francisco111.2
Saint Mary’s110.8
Santa Clara106.3
Loyola Marymount103.2
San Diego99.1
Pepperdine96.4
Pacific95.7
Portland94.2

Western Athletic
TeamRating
New Mexico St.104.8
Abilene Christian103.9
Grand Canyon103.7
Utah Valley103.1
Stephen F. Austin100.6
Seattle99.3
Tarleton St.99.1
Cal Baptist97.9
Sam Houston St.96.9
UT Rio Grande Valley92.9
Dixie St.91.9
Lamar90.7
Chicago St.82.7

February 20, 2020

Comparison of Old & New R+T Ratings

We hope you read our piece earlier this week describing our updated R+T Rating for 2020.  If you didn’t, and if you are a new reader to the PiRate Ratings, after thanking you for stopping buy and remembering you are getting exactly what you paid for here, the following is a quick tutorial on what R+T Rating means.

  1. The R+T Rating is a metric that applies only to the NCAA Tournament.

  2. The R+T Rating attempts to estimate extra scoring opportunities by teams in NCAA Tournament games.

  3. Over the last two decades when the needed statistics to calculate R+T Ratings, the National Champions and most of the Final Four teams rated near the top of the field in R+T Rating.  

  4. The reason the R+T Rating is so important in the NCAA Tournament only is because the other metrics are better applied in an environment where half of the teams in Division 1 are below average offensively, while a separate half of the teams in Division 1 are below average defensively.  In the NCAA Tournament, almost all teams are above average offensively and defensively, so these extra scoring opportunities frequently are the difference.   It only takes one nice scoring spurt to win a tightly contested game in the Big Dance.

We used the same R+T Rating for almost two decades, only slightly tweaking the weighting for these stats.  The old R+T Rating, which we will continue to publish this year, is:

(R * 2) + (S * .5) + (6 – Opp S) + T

R = Rebounding Margin
S = Average Steals Per Game
T = Turnover Margin

This metric shows that rebounding margin is more important than turnover margin, but steals are more important than other types of turnovers.  The reason is that steals lead to the most potential points per possession.  When a team steals the ball, they are usually facing their own basket (whereas on a rebound, their backs are to their own basket).  The team committing the turnover by steal must do a 180° turn to defend, and the stealing team takes off on a fast break.

This R+T Rating helped us pick some big upsets for many years.  Teams with high R+T Ratings and adequate strengths of schedule advanced in the tournaments at the expense of teams with low R+T Ratings.  In multiple years, teams with negative R+T Ratings lost quickly in the Big Dance, even teams that were #2, 3, and 4 seeds.  We correctly picked two different Georgetown teams to be upset as heavy favorites, because those Hoya teams had negative or very low positive R+T Ratings.  For three years, we picked Vanderbilt to lose in the first game against underdogs because Vanderbilt also had negative or very low R+T Ratings.  At the other end of the spectrum, the team with the highest R+T Rating and a significantly strong schedule has cut down the nets multiple times.

If the R+T Rating has been an accurate predictor of potential NCAA Tournament success, why did we need to create a new version?  We did so, because the old version simply counted actual margins without concerning itself with possessions.  Rate stats are more accurate than counting stats.  As we have used as an example many times, a team that outrebounds its opponents 35-30 has done a better job than a team that outrebounded its opponents 43-37.  Strictly counting 43-37 is +6 and 35-30 is only +5, but 35-30 is 53.85% while 43-37 is 53.75%, so 35-30 is a tad better.  We want our stats to be as accurate as possible, so we switched to rate stats over counting stats.

But, we have an issue.  The variables now must change as well, because percentages are totally different from standard numbers.  We have tried to back-test the new variables and include a constant to try to make the outcome look the same but more accurate.

Here is the explanation for the new R+T Rating.

1. Use 4-Factors Rate Stats
A. Offensive Rebound %
B. Opponents’ Offensive Rebound %
C. Steal %
D. Opponents’ Steal %
E. Turnover %
F. Opponents’ Turnover %

2. Take the difference in each stat from the national average for each stat. There will be discrepancies in the offensive and defensive averages due to D1 vs. D2 games, so we set the national average from the mean of the offensive and defensive norms.
For example: O Reb% = 28.43 & D Reb% = 27.79, then the mean Reb% for Division 1 in 2020 is 28.1.

3. For Rebounding Rate Margin & Turnover Rate Margin take the sum of offensive and defensive rates and divide by 2.
Example: A team’s OReb Margin is +6.4% and DReb Margin is -1.2%. Reb Rate Margin would be +2.6%

4. We Keep Steal Rate Margins Separate as in original R+T.

5. The New Formula Now Becomes:

((R*8)+(S*2+((5-Opp S)*2)+(T*4)))/2.75

 

Here’s how we calculate a sample new R+T Rate.

The Big State University Pumas have these stats

Offensive Rebounding % = 34.8.  With a national Rebound % mean of 28.1, Big State’s offensive rebound rate margin is +6.7% (34.8-28.1)

Opponents’ Offensive Rebounding % = 28.6.  With a national Rebound % mean of 28.1, The defensive margin or Big State’s opponents offensive rebound margin is -0.5 (28.1-28.6)

Now we add the two margins and divide by 2  (+6.7 – 0.5) / 2 = 3.1

3.1 would be the new R number in the equation.

Big State has a steal rate of 10.6% and a defensive steal rate of 9.6%.  The national average steal rate is 9.2%.  

So, Big State’s S Rating would be +1.4 (10.6-9.2).  Their opponents’ S would be +.4% (in this case the higher the number, the worse off it is for the team).

Big State has a turnover rate of 16.8% and a defensive turnover rate of 18.2%.  The national average for turnovers is 16.9%, so Big State’s turnover rate margin would be 0.1%, and their defensive turnover rate margin would be 1.3%.

So Big State’s T Rating would be 0.7,  (.1+1.3)/2

Now we have all the numbers we need to plug into the calculation.

((R*8)+(S*2+((5-Opp S)*2)+(T*4)))/2.75

For Big State, the equation becomes:

((3.1 * 8) + (1.4 * 2 + ((5 – .4) *2) + (0.7 * 4)))/2.75 = 14.4

Big State’s R+T Rating would be 14.4, which is about average for an NCAA Tournament Team.  We must at this point look at their schedule strength to see if it merits worthiness against teams most likely to advance into additional NCAA Tournament rounds.

So, by now you are maybe wanting to see some real R+T Ratings?  We are going to show you both the old and new R+T Ratings for the current top 20 teams in the nation.

Here is the old R+T list with the schedule strength.  For schedule strength, 50.0 is average.  55.0 and higher means the team has played a tough schedule.  Below 45.0 means the team has played a weak schedule.  Usually national champions have a strength of schedule between 56 and 62, and most Final Four Teams have strengths of schedule between 52 and 62.

Old R+T

Team

R+T No.

SOS

Gonzaga

24.6

53.9

Houston

23.0

55.8

West Virginia

20.6

60.4

Kansas

17.0

62.3

Baylor

17.0

59.4

Duke

16.5

58.6

San Diego St.

15.9

53.6

Louisville

15.3

57.6

Colorado

14.4

57.6

Maryland

13.1

59.9

Florida St.

12.8

57.9

Butler

11.9

59.7

Kentucky

11.9

56.7

Penn St.

10.3

59.8

Dayton

9.4

54.4

Iowa

9.4

60.8

Marquette

8.1

59.8

Villanova

7.5

60.0

Seton Hall

4.9

60.4

Creighton

2.2

60.3

 

Looking at the old R+T, the Big East appears to be a bit overrated this year.  The four Top 20 teams with the lowest R+T Ratings are all Big East teams.

Until last night, Duke had a much more impressive R+T than they do today, but losing by 22 to North Carolina State, and getting outrebounded and committing more turnovers and having the ball stolen more against the Wolf Pack led to the Blue Devils dropping down to sixth.

Gonzaga’s R+T is about where it was when the Bulldogs advanced to the National Championship Game against North Carolina a few years back.  At the moment, their schedule strength is a tad too low, but GU has games remaining against Saint Mary’s and BYU and likely another game against one of the two in the WCC Championship Game.  The Zags’ SOS could move up a little.

 

 

New R+T Rating

 

Team

R+T Rate

SOS

West Virginia

26.5

60.4

Gonzaga

21.5

53.9

Houston

20.9

55.8

Baylor

18.7

59.4

Duke

18.3

58.6

Colorado

15.3

57.6

Kansas

14.4

62.3

Florida St.

12.7

57.9

San Diego St.

12.7

53.6

Louisville

11.9

57.6

Maryland

10.7

59.9

Iowa

9.6

60.8

Penn St.

8.6

59.8

Butler

7.6

59.7

Villanova

5.7

60.0

Marquette

4.1

59.8

Kentucky

3.8

56.7

Seton Hall

3.1

60.4

Dayton

1.6

54.4

Creighton

-5.5

60.3

 

The new R+T gives a little more credit to three of the Big East teams.  Obviously, lower possessions per game in the Big East are partly to blame for lower counting stats, but on the whole, this does not look like a great potential year for the Big East.

Look at the top four teams here.  All four are teams that are west of the Mississippi River.  There hasn’t been an NCAA Champion from west of the Mississippi River since Kansas in 2008.  There hasn’t been an NCAA Champion from west of the Rockies since Arizona in 1997.  Did you know that the last 11 NCAA Champions came from the Eastern Time Zone?  And, did you know that the last NCAA Champion from the Pacific Time Zone was UCLA in 1995?

January 22, 2019

Fun Stuff For Stats Buffs-Part 3: Efficiency

Before getting into the meat of this final installment, I must apologize in advance for the brevity in this last segment.  Time constraints have made it impossible to thoroughly peruse individual offensive and defensive efficiency.

That may be a good thing for you the reader, because you can read the dictionary about as quickly as you can go through all the steps involved in calculating individual efficiency.  Suffice it to say that there are several parts to this calculation.  One must have a lengthy formula on a spreadsheet where a player’s and his team’s statistics can be inputted, and the spreadsheet spits out the numbers.

If you really want to know the entire process, then you absolutely must purchase the book by the number one authoritative source on the matter.

The book is: Basketball on Paper: Rules and Tools for Performance Analysis by Dean Oliver.  You might be able to find it in a library, as it is included in the catalog of more than 750 libraries throughout the nation, more than likely at a local college or university library near you.

Just to show you how involved the formulas are, it takes 18 separate calculations from start to finish for each player’s offensive number and almost as many for his defensive number.

The NCAA Selection Committee will use Team Offensive Efficiency and Team Defensive Efficiency in their process of picking the at-large teams and seeding all 68 teams.  This is rather simple and can be explained briefly.

Offensive Efficiency = Points scored per 100 possessions

Defensive Efficiency = Points allowed per 100 possessions.

In the 21st Century, possessions are kept as a statistic, but if you cannot find this number, you can estimate it very accurately by this formula.

Team Possessions = FG Attempts + (.475* FT Attempts) – Offensive Rebounds + Turnovers

In the NBA, substitute .44 for .475 in FT Attempts.

Obviously, round the product from the Free Throw Attempts formula to the nearest whole number.

Let’s look at some examples for a game, a season to date, and some past seasons.

Example #1. Nevada vs. Air Force, January 19, 2019

Nevada defeated Air Force 67-52 last Saturday in Reno.  The Wolfpack totally shut down the Falcons’ offense, while Air Force played capable defense on the perimeter, forcing Nevada players to hurry their three-point shots.

For the game, Nevada had 57 total field goal attempts, 23 free throw attempts, 9 offensive rebounds, and 14 turnovers.

To calculate possessions, plug the numbers into the equation:

57 + (.475 * 23) -9 + 14 = 73

For Air Force, their stat line included 51 total field goal attempts, just 9 free throw attempts, 3 offensive rebounds, and 21 turnovers.

51 + (.475 * 9) -3 + 21 = 73

Possessions must be equal or off by one or two between the teams, because after one team completes a possession, the other team gets the ball.  Two is the most advantageous one team can have over the other in possessions.  This comes about when the team that gets the opening tap also gets the last possession of the first half, as well as the first and last possession of the game.  It happens very rarely, because in order to have the first and last possession of both halves, there must be an odd number of jump ball calls in the first half so that the team that got the opening tap also gets the first possession of the second half..

Let’s get back to the calculation.

Nevada scored 67 points on 73 possessions

67/73 = 0.918 or 91.8 points per 100 possessions

Air Force scored 52 points on 73 possessions

52/73 = .712 or 71.2 points per 100 possessions

 

Example #2: Gonzaga vs. San Francisco, January 12, 2019

In this key West Coast Conference game with first place in the league on the line, Gonzaga went to the Bay and beat the Dons 96-83.

Gonzaga: 69 FGA, 21 FTA, 12 Off Reb, 4 TOV

69 + (.475 * 21) – 12 + 4 = 71 possessions

USF: 69 FGA, 25 FTA, 14 Off Reb, 5 TOV

69 + (.475 * 25) – 14 + 5 = 72 possessions

Gonzaga 96 points on 71 possessions = 1.352 points per possession or 135.2 points per 100 possessions.

San Francisco 83 points on 72 possessions = 1.153 points per possession or 115.3 points per 100 possessions.

 

Example 3: Michigan Wolverines to date

Michigan used to win games by three-point barrages and fast break points and limited defense.  Then, after assistant coach Luke Yaklich came to Ann Arbor to install his multiple defenses, the Maize and Blue became just as tough on the defensive side if not better defensively.

So far this year, the Wolverines have these offensive and defensive stats through 18 games.

Offense: 1,021 FGA, 318 FTA, 165 Off. Rebounds, 175 Turnovers in 18 games

1021 + (.475 * 318) – 165 + 175 = 1,182 total possessions and 65.7 possessions per game.

Michigan has scored 1,306 points in 18 games.

1,306 / 1,182 * 100 = 110.5 points per 100 possessions.

Michigan’s Defense has given up: 1,003 FGA, 210 FTA, 142 off. Rebounds, and  237 turnovers.

1,003 + (.475 * 210) – 142 + 237 = 1,198 total possessions and 66.6 possessions per game.

Michigan has surrendered 1,027 points in 18 games.

1,027 / 1,198 * 100 = 85.7 points per 100 possessions.

A raw point spread between two teams can be estimated by combining their offensive and defensive points 100 possessions and factoring in strengths of schedule and home court advantage.

Let’s look at State vs. Tech in an imaginary matchup.

State has an offensive efficiency of 110 points per 100 possessions and a defensive efficiency of 90 points per 100 possessions against a schedule 3 points weaker than average.  They average 76 possessions per game, and their home court advantage is worth 3 points.

Tech has an offensive efficiency of 102 points per 100 possessions and a defensive efficiency of 99 points per 100 possessions against a schedule 8 points better than average.  They average 66 possessions per game.

For the year in question, the national average for possessions is 70 per game, so State plays at a tempo of about 8.6% above average, while Tech plays at a tempo of about 5.7% below average.  Because it is easier for one team to slow pace down more than it is for another team to speed pace up (unless they press full court for most of the game), it can be estimated that this game will have about 69 possessions.

If State outscores its opponents by 20 points per 100 possessions, in 69 possessions, this equates to 13.8 points.

If Tech outscores its opponents by 3 points per 100 possessions, in 69 possessions, this equates to 2.07 points.

To this point, State looks like an 11.73 point favorite over Tech, but this is not the case.  Schedule strength and home court advantage must be included.

If Tech’s schedule on average has been about 11 points tougher per game than State, you then add those 11 points in Tech’s favor.  Now, the State’s advantage has been reduced to 0.73 points.  Tech’s home court advantage is 3 points, so the expected outcome would be State by 3.73, or 4 points.

This is a crude method once used by the PiRate Ratings, as the Blue Rating.  We no longer use this method, as there are more accurate ways to determine pointspreads, namely using algorithms of the Four Factors with schedule strengths, home court advantage, and road team disadvantage.

Example 4: Villanova 2018 season

The Wildcats won their second national championship in three years last season, finishing with a 36-4 record.  They scored 3,463 points and allowed 2,807 points in 40 games.

Here are their pertinent stats to calculate efficiency.

Field Goal Attempts: 2,440

Opponents: 2,401

Free Throw Attempts: 718

Opponents: 641

Offensive Rebounds: 380

Opponents: 378

Turnovers: 426

Opponents: 512

Possessions: 2,440 + (.475 * 718) – 380 + 426 = 2,827 (70.7 possessions per game)

Opponents: 2,401 + (.475 * 641) – 378 + 512 = 2,839 (71.0 possessions per game)

Offensive Efficiency

3,463/2,827 * 100 = 122.5 points per 100 possessions

Defensive Efficiency

2,807/2839 * 100 = 98.9 points per 100 possessions

 

How does this compare to past national champions?  Because offensive rebounding stats were not officially kept until this century, it can only be estimated for the 20th Century.  No doubt the UCLA teams of 1967 thru 1969 and 1972 and 1973 would be off the charts great, as the Bruins dominated in every aspect of the game during their dynasty years.

There are some very fine teams that won championships in recent years, so let’s look at the national champions during this time.  The number shown is the total scoring margin per 100 possessions.  Of course, schedule strength is not equal for these teams, but on the whole, there is not a lot of difference, as these champions all played schedules between 5 and 10 points above the national average.

When adjusted to schedule strength, here are the 10 best teams in the 21st Century using the PiRate Ratings formula.

2008: Kansas 124.0

2001: Duke 123.6

2018: Villanova 122.9

2010: Duke 122.1

2013: Louisville 121.8

2005: North Carolina 121.7

2012: Kentucky 121.5

2015: Duke 121.3 

2016: Villanova 120.9

2009: North Carolina 120.3

2007: Florida 120.1

2002: Maryland 119.6

2004: Connecticut 117.9

2006: Florida 117.1

2017: North Carolina 117.0

2011: Connecticut 115.8

2003: Syracuse 115.1

2014: Connecticut 111.6

Note that the national champions through these seasons were not necessarily the highest rated team by efficiency.  For instance, Connecticut was not considered a factor at the end of the 2011 regular season.  They finished tied for 9th in the Big East, and thus they had to play in the opening round of the conference tournament.  To win the conference tournament, they would have to do something never done before or since–win five games in five days.  The Huskies became the big story of Championship Week win Coach Jim Calhoun rode his star guard Kemba Walker to the title, winning five games in five days at Madison Square Garden, as Walker performed for his friends and family from the Bronx, averaging 26 points per game by taking it to the hoop and drawing enough fouls to shoot 54 free throws in just five games.

The Huskies were on a roll, and they won six more games in the Big Dance.  They finished 11-0 and still only rose to 15.8 points better than average against an average schedule.  Before this 11-game streak, UConn was just 9-9 in the conference.  However, the Huskies had played a very difficult schedule that included 18 ranked opponents, in which they went 12-6 in those games.  All nine of their losses came to NCAA Tournament teams, so strength of schedule was terribly important in factoring their adjusted efficiency.

 

2019 Top Efficiency

By now, you must want to know which teams are at the top in total efficiency?  It should come as no surprise that the NET Ratings and the Efficiency Ratings are about the same.

Virginia, Duke, Michigan State, Gonzaga, and Tennessee are at the tops in adjusted efficiency, or to put it bluntly, what the NCAA Selection Committee will look at.  Likewise, these are also the top five teams in NET Ratings, so if the Selection Committed picked the bracket today, four of these five would be your number one seeds, and the fifth would be the top number two seed.

This doesn’t mean that one of these five teams will win the national championship, but the odds are that from this group of five, there is about a 50-50 chance that one will win the title.  Of course, this is only a mid-season ranking.  The ranking on March 17.

 

Individual Efficiency

I won’t begin to explain individual offensive and defensive efficiency, as my only recommendation it to read Basketball on Paper, as Oliver is the Bill James (or Tom Tango) of basketball analysis.

Let me just list which players from the power conferences rate at the top.

Can you guess who is the current number one player in efficiency?  I bet if you had one free guess to win a car on a game show, you’d win the car.

The best player in college ball today is the best player in total efficiency.  It comes as no surprise that Duke’s Zion Williamson is number one, and he is far ahead of the field.  Gonzaga’s Brandon Clarke is a distant number two, and Wisconin’s Ethan Happ is almost as far being Clarke in third place as Clarke is behind Williamson.

Before you think that this rating is due to just these three players being great, let me add that their coaches and teammates are also important in this rating.  Coach Mike Krzyzewski has produced a lot of highly efficient players.  Sure, most of them were McDonald’s All-Americans, but there are some of these 5-star players in recent history that are not all that efficient.

Vanderbilt’s Simi Shittu was the Number 7 overall player in this current freshman class, a 5-star McDonald’s All-American.  The Commodores are one of the least efficient teams from a Power Conference, and Shittu’s numbers have headed south once SEC play began, and the opposition quickly learned his liabilities.  Shittu actually owns a negative offensive efficiency rating through 17 games, and an even worse rating in five conference games, as he has negative efficiency in both offense and defense.  It doesn’t help his efficiency when he has a 7.8% three-point accuracy, low free throw percentage, and a high turnover percentage.  I have heard comparisons made to former St. John’s 5-star player Wayne McKoy from the 1970’s, when McKoy went from top player in the freshman class to never playing in the NBA.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Blog at WordPress.com.