Team |
SOS |
TS Marg |
OReb% |
DReb% |
TOV% |
DTOV% |
R+T |
Gonzaga |
56.36 |
17.3 |
30.7 |
73.6 |
12.9 |
16.5 |
15.0 |
Texas Tech |
59.03 |
10.2 |
27.6 |
72.0 |
16.0 |
20.0 |
4.2 |
Texas Tech enjoys a slight SOS edge, but Gonzaga’s exceptional R+T Rating is a major factor in this game. Gonzaga will enjoy a modest rebounding advantage at both ends of the court, while the Bulldogs will be able to withstand the Red Raiders’ ball-hawking ability. Thus, turnover margin should be close to even. Gonzaga’s TS% Margin is somewhat better here, and the SOS advantage by TTU is mostly negated.
Prediction: Gonzaga by 6 to 11 points
Team |
SOS |
TS Marg |
OReb% |
DReb% |
TOV% |
DTOV% |
R+T |
Virginia |
59.89 |
12.3 |
29.7 |
75.0 |
12.9 |
15.8 |
10.2 |
Purdue |
61.14 |
3.6 |
34.0 |
74.0 |
13.5 |
16.6 |
11.5 |
Purdue’s SOS and R+T Rating are marginally better, while Virginia holds a commanding TS% Margin advantage. Purdue should grab a few additional offensive rebounds in this game, while turnovers should be relatively close. This has the makings of an exciting close game, just like so many others in this year’s tournament. In this game, the Bracketnomics cannot pick a conclusive winner, so other factors must be included. Virginia has been a little more consistent in matching their statistical data, while Purdue has been a little more varied. I will go with the more consistent team.
Prediction: Virginia by 2 to 7 points
Team |
SOS |
TS Marg |
OReb% |
DReb% |
TOV% |
DTOV% |
R+T |
Kentucky |
60.76 |
9.8 |
36.6 |
74.7 |
15.8 |
16.0 |
16.2 |
Auburn |
60.34 |
1.9 |
32.2 |
67.8 |
14.6 |
21.8 |
2.7 |
The effect of the Chuma Okeke injury can only be estimated for Auburn, while Kentucky’s P.J. Washington appears to be close to 100% for this game after playing well against Houston.
You would expect conference rivals at this point of the season to have similar SOS’s, and these two teams do. Kentucky’s R+T Rating is so superior in this game, and their TS% Margin is considerably better, so this makes it a potential blowout game. Auburn will force the Wildcats into a few extra turnovers, but the rebounding edge could be scary in this game, as the Big Blue might be able to win the boards by more than a 60-40% advantage.
During the regular season, Kentucky beat Auburn both times. It was a close game in Auburn, but the Wildcats breezed to an easy win in Lexington.
Prediction: Kentucky by 10 to 15 points
Team |
SOS |
TS Marg |
OReb% |
DReb% |
TOV% |
DTOV% |
R+T |
Duke |
62.63 |
9.8 |
35.5 |
71.0 |
14.7 |
17.0 |
12.1 |
Michigan St. |
61.29 |
14.0 |
33.8 |
74.1 |
16.4 |
12.7 |
12.3 |
This game has the makings of another classic. The data predicts a close contest. Duke’s SOS advantage is minimal, and the R+T Ratings basically wash. Michigan State’s TS% Margin mostly comes from a better 3-point shooting ability, and only slightly better defense. Duke’s big advantage comes in turnover margin. The Blue Devils have the ability to exploit the Spartans’ real liability, as Sparty is prone to turning the ball over, while Duke is a competent team when it comes to forcing turnovers. Michigan State’s normal rebounding strength will be somewhat negated if not totally negated in this game.
It isn’t a slam dunk win for Coach K over Coach Izzo, but the Blue Devils have more going for themselves in the data for this one.
Prediction: Duke by 5 to 10 points